Viewing profile — drt1245
drt1245
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jun 26, 2011, 2:10 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 21
- Public activity
- 10 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About drt1245
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #23752830
Recent versions of Debian require a 686. https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch02s01.en.html#...
-
comment
Comment #14361444
Additionally, he keeps talking about dereferencing the pointer, which I don't think is right. The pointer never gets deferenced in the code shown. I'm not an x86 guru, but I think …
-
comment
Comment #14135214
>Let's assume that when a river gets redirected, a scientist goes and investigates it This is a faulty assumption and is what leads to the wrong conclusion. The probability of 0.5%…
-
comment
Comment #14133252
I think a better analogy is that it's like having many pairs of dice, and rolling each pair in turn until you get a roll of 12. Then concluding "this particular pair of dice must b…
-
comment
Comment #9035236
https://www.google.com/search?q=china+income+inequality If that was the case, China's growth would be stagnating as well. Not everything is caused by income inequality.
-
comment
Comment #3592521
Where 1 f(x) = (x-1)/9 + 1, maps bijectively from [1,4] to [1,4/3] g(x) = (x-1)/9 + 4/3, maps bijectively from [1,4] to [4/3,5/3] h(x) = (x-1)/9 + 5/3 maps bijectively from [1,4] t…
-
comment
Comment #3592480
> The argument "Addition breaks" proves just as well that zero "isn't a number", since it breaks division rather badly. Mathematically, numbers (be it natural, rational, real, or c…
-
comment
Comment #3592405
Not only does there exist a bijective mapping between [1,2] and [1,4], there exists infinite different bijective mappings between a subset of [1,2] and [1,4]. i.e.: One could map b…
-
comment
Comment #3554525
The problem is a loss of verbosity. The next person looking at the code isn't necessarily going to know how MAX is defined, and saving 1 line of code isn't worth making it less cle…
-
comment
Comment #3554329
int a = f(); if (a I believe the latter will generally result in 2 calls to f() (unless it returns less than zero), which could cause undesired behavior or just be inefficient. Of …