Viewing profile — drorgill
drorgill
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Feb 27, 2013, 1:40 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 49
- Public activity
- 8 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About drorgill
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #5290308
Again, you are missing the point. Where did the CRF number of 18.5 come from? Did you test several parameters, and found what parameter gives lower bitrates than Beamr Video on thi…
-
comment
Comment #5290178
Note my previous reply on this issue: JPEGmini adaptively encodes each JPEG file to the minimum file size possible without affecting its original quality (the output size is of cou…
-
comment
Comment #5290093
Even if you compare #2 and #3 and they are similar quality, what would that prove? You could do #3 for a specific file after Beamr Video has processed it, but how would you know th…
-
comment
Comment #5290068
We don't have a constant bitrate feature. And the comparison you refer to was not done on content encoded with Beamr Video, but on content encoded with "Beamr-like" settings for an…
-
comment
Comment #5290020
Those are just preview files used for fast page load, but they are based on resized versions of the original and the JPEGmini version. You are welcome to download the original and …
-
comment
Comment #5290006
The decision Beamr Video makes are "smarter" than x264's CRF mode, since they are based on a perceptual quality measure we have developed. This quality measure is similar to the on…
-
comment
Comment #5289999
Beamr Video is not a bitrate-driven encoder - you cannot specify the bitrate of the output clip, so we cannot provide 2). We can only provide an output clip with the same quality a…
-
comment
Comment #5289943
Daiz hello, this is Dror from Beamr. The technologies we have developed, JPEGmini and Beamr Video, are definitely not "Snake Oil", and I don't think it would be good practice to ma…