Viewing profile — drdeca
drdeca
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Aug 22, 2013, 10:07 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,594
- Public activity
- 2,459 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About drdeca
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49225569
There’s a minimum karma requirement.
-
comment
Comment #49218054
I don’t think what you are pointing at is a real issue. Something exists. Therefore, on of the following 3 must hold: “one or more things exists or have existed which were not a co…
-
comment
Comment #49214644
“GP” in this context is short for “grandparent” or “grandparent post”. It means the comment that they comment they are replying to, is a reply to.
-
comment
Comment #49186197
Can you give an instrumentalization (spelling?) for “ingenuity” by which we can test whether a behavior (in a context) shows any “ingenuity”?
-
comment
Comment #49087514
Well, of course at the real hardware level there will be some non-zero amount of nondeterminism, but the error correction steps that have been implemented are enough to make the pr…
-
comment
Comment #49087294
It is true of course that there is no automatic procedure which takes in an arbitrary program and decides if it has a desired input/output behavior. (Whether an input program has a…
-
comment
Comment #49072550
Eh? I don’t see how Gödel’s results imply that.
-
comment
Comment #49029051
Most people don’t want to hurt lots of other people in an untargeted way, yes. But there are a lot of people, and, apparently a few of them shot up some electrical substations? If …
-
comment
Comment #49028947
Whether or not this is compatible with how the constitution ought to be understood, in practice, it is illegal to create a nuclear bomb. Maybe those laws should be considered uncon…
-
comment
Comment #49010664
Well, what’s the theorem statement for the result you’re thinking of then? Of course n bits can only encode for 2^n options. But to prove mathematically that we are close to the be…
-
comment
Comment #49000514
So, when you said “proven” I thought you might have meant like, a mathematical proof. It appears that this is not what you meant. (Right?) (If it is what you meant, I was asking fo…
-
comment
Comment #48998681
What proof of a ceiling are you talking about? Wouldn’t proving this require a good definition for intelligence, which I don’t think there is consensus on?
-
comment
Comment #48943416
Do you think the sort of people who complain about articles being AI-written are incapable of writing articles or something? Why would not being willing to read articles produced t…
-
comment
Comment #48909319
I think there is both value that comes from the work being authored by a human, and value which does not?
-
comment
Comment #48828394
If your prediction is a probability distribution, rather than a discrete outcome label, then, assuming the distribution over the future depends continuously on your action, there s…
-
comment
Comment #48819867
Do you know any browsers which don’t support https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ (if you remove the google traffic tracking js that’s iirc tacked on at the end of the page (or maybe …
-
comment
Comment #48666279
Was surprised and somewhat disappointed that the article doesn’t appear to evaluate how well the models work when running in the harnesses optimized for the other models. Do they s…
-
comment
Comment #48637572
This seems implausible.
-
comment
Comment #48624864
The criticism of “these posts are AI generated” seems like something that is about the posts themselves?
-
comment
Comment #48543824
If that’s it, why is it using ∋ rather than ∈? I would expect “Ǝx∈ℕ”.
-
comment
Comment #48456788
I feel like this didn’t really go anywhere? In the discussion section he says that this should provide reason to not expect easy theorems or answers, but I don’t feel like that was…
-
comment
Comment #48419468
Huh? Any process on a computer by itself is also a Markov chain. If you include all the information the LLM uses to produce the next token as part of the state, then of course the …
-
comment
Comment #48401746
A convex hull is a different thing than the linear span. It is smaller. And, my point is that the inputs it is often fed are not in the convex hull of the inputs in the training da…
-
comment
Comment #48229735
I suppose it is conceivable that there are some useful ideas that cannot be described in terms of language we understand (e.g. if there are ideas that are alien to us and beyond wh…
-
comment
Comment #48229588
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. Are you agreeing or disagreeing with me? If it can only interpolate in a literal sense, that means that it only produces good outputs on co…