Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — drdeca

drdeca

HN member
Joined
Thu, Aug 22, 2013, 10:07 PM UTC
HN karma
2,594
Public activity
2,459 items

About drdeca

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49225569

    There’s a minimum karma requirement.

  2. comment
    Comment #49218054

    I don’t think what you are pointing at is a real issue. Something exists. Therefore, on of the following 3 must hold: “one or more things exists or have existed which were not a co…

  3. comment
    Comment #49214644

    “GP” in this context is short for “grandparent” or “grandparent post”. It means the comment that they comment they are replying to, is a reply to.

  4. comment
    Comment #49186197

    Can you give an instrumentalization (spelling?) for “ingenuity” by which we can test whether a behavior (in a context) shows any “ingenuity”?

  5. comment
    Comment #49087514

    Well, of course at the real hardware level there will be some non-zero amount of nondeterminism, but the error correction steps that have been implemented are enough to make the pr…

  6. comment
    Comment #49087294

    It is true of course that there is no automatic procedure which takes in an arbitrary program and decides if it has a desired input/output behavior. (Whether an input program has a…

  7. comment
    Comment #49072550

    Eh? I don’t see how Gödel’s results imply that.

  8. comment
    Comment #49029051

    Most people don’t want to hurt lots of other people in an untargeted way, yes. But there are a lot of people, and, apparently a few of them shot up some electrical substations? If …

  9. comment
    Comment #49028947

    Whether or not this is compatible with how the constitution ought to be understood, in practice, it is illegal to create a nuclear bomb. Maybe those laws should be considered uncon…

  10. comment
    Comment #49010664

    Well, what’s the theorem statement for the result you’re thinking of then? Of course n bits can only encode for 2^n options. But to prove mathematically that we are close to the be…

  11. comment
    Comment #49000514

    So, when you said “proven” I thought you might have meant like, a mathematical proof. It appears that this is not what you meant. (Right?) (If it is what you meant, I was asking fo…

  12. comment
    Comment #48998681

    What proof of a ceiling are you talking about? Wouldn’t proving this require a good definition for intelligence, which I don’t think there is consensus on?

  13. comment
    Comment #48943416

    Do you think the sort of people who complain about articles being AI-written are incapable of writing articles or something? Why would not being willing to read articles produced t…

  14. comment
    Comment #48909319

    I think there is both value that comes from the work being authored by a human, and value which does not?

  15. comment
    Comment #48828394

    If your prediction is a probability distribution, rather than a discrete outcome label, then, assuming the distribution over the future depends continuously on your action, there s…

  16. comment
    Comment #48819867

    Do you know any browsers which don’t support https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ (if you remove the google traffic tracking js that’s iirc tacked on at the end of the page (or maybe …

  17. comment
    Comment #48666279

    Was surprised and somewhat disappointed that the article doesn’t appear to evaluate how well the models work when running in the harnesses optimized for the other models. Do they s…

  18. comment
    Comment #48637572

    This seems implausible.

  19. comment
    Comment #48624864

    The criticism of “these posts are AI generated” seems like something that is about the posts themselves?

  20. comment
    Comment #48543824

    If that’s it, why is it using ∋ rather than ∈? I would expect “Ǝx∈ℕ”.

  21. comment
    Comment #48456788

    I feel like this didn’t really go anywhere? In the discussion section he says that this should provide reason to not expect easy theorems or answers, but I don’t feel like that was…

  22. comment
    Comment #48419468

    Huh? Any process on a computer by itself is also a Markov chain. If you include all the information the LLM uses to produce the next token as part of the state, then of course the …

  23. comment
    Comment #48401746

    A convex hull is a different thing than the linear span. It is smaller. And, my point is that the inputs it is often fed are not in the convex hull of the inputs in the training da…

  24. comment
    Comment #48229735

    I suppose it is conceivable that there are some useful ideas that cannot be described in terms of language we understand (e.g. if there are ideas that are alien to us and beyond wh…

  25. comment
    Comment #48229588

    Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. Are you agreeing or disagreeing with me? If it can only interpolate in a literal sense, that means that it only produces good outputs on co…