Viewing profile — dranov
dranov
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Nov 11, 2013, 2:19 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 42
- Public activity
- 12 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About dranov
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49024282
Check out https://veil.dev/ There's a blog post with a demo at https://proofsandintuitions.net/2026/02/09/distributed-verif... It's still early days, but we're committed to making …
-
comment
Comment #47241400
Cedar used to be written in Dafny, but AWS abandoned that implementation and rewrote it in Lean. https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/opensource/lean-into-verified-s...
-
comment
Comment #21665236
> I looked a little into RustBelt; how would it have helped this `Pin` issue? I browsed [1] a bit and it seems like `Pin` would have to have been proven on its own in an ad-hoc way…
-
comment
Comment #18968622
I might be mistaken, but my understanding is that it does not. You still need to trust the implementation of the logic. But if you don't trust that, you wouldn't trust the compiler…
-
comment
Comment #18968499
CompCert doesn't do this, but CakeML, a verified compiler for a variant of ML bootstraps itself in the logic : > A unique feature of the CakeML compiler is that it is bootstrapped …
-
comment
Comment #18967752
> Are you including Bitcoin script when you say consensus? Currently, no. Our model considers "consensus" to be agreement on the ordering of transactions. We don't yet interpret th…
-
comment
Comment #18967145
I agree, and there are efforts to develop formally verified implementations of Nakamoto consensus (which I'm involved in). We've published a paper a year ago about our efforts and …
-
comment
Comment #18415097
> I’d really appreciate [...] links to the work of similar initiatives Take a look at Quorum, a "programming language which is designed to be accessible to individuals with disabil…
-
comment
Comment #17687432
> SAT solvers generally have poor support for constructive logic, the kind of logic used in theorem provers based on dependent types like Coq. Arguably, this is no longer the case.…
-
comment
Comment #16814705
The link is that both these policies hurt US tech companies. With that lens, there is no inconsistency.
-
comment
Comment #16805933
Apparently, v1.0 of the Facebook Graph API could access users' private messages via the 'read_mailbox' API request [1]. This was deprecated when v2.0 launched. " Version 1.0 of the…
-
comment
Comment #16744359
That sounds a lot like BitMessage. https://bitmessage.org/bitmessage.pdf