Viewing profile — dr2chase
dr2chase
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Oct 14, 2014, 12:13 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 10
- Public activity
- 8 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About dr2chase
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45879776
Depends how you define "equal". One approach is simply to scale the charge by income -- effectively, convert time to money, and charge you a congestion tax of some amount of money-…
-
comment
Comment #45851656
author here, you are right, I missed that. In my pathetic defense, the normal argument around here (Cambridge, MA) is about literal lane widening and narrowing, and not adding and …
-
comment
Comment #45851547
Hi, author of the article. I'm assuming urban traffic speeds, which is what I observe all the time myself, but you can look at the video of those kids, and count, and look at the s…
-
comment
Comment #36432400
The way to view it is "unless there is syntactic sharing, it is a for loop, same as before". The compiler uses a syntactic test (with little knowledge of control flow or value use)…
-
comment
Comment #17968647
How do you get mm-wave radiation to an aquatic plant? Skin depth at that frequency is tiny. Are they doing studies on duckweed? (Look up the plant, indeed, they are.) And I can see…
-
comment
Comment #8451409
Speaking both pedantically and based on my experience riding a bicycle, when traffic speed is reduced all the way to zero, it is in fact safer, at least for me. I am of course, not…
-
comment
Comment #8451365
I think it's a three-part problem. One, it is a flow problem, and by removing congestion at one bottleneck you mostly deliver traffic more efficiently to the next bottleneck. Actua…
-
comment
Comment #8451317
As someone else pointed out, reducing peak speeds does not necessarily increase travel time. See this report on the Prospect Park West redesign: http://jonathansoma.com/ppw/ I comm…