Viewing profile — downvotetruth

The first sentence is almost completely subjective, and the leading fact in second sentence gives the best evidence against an overpass in this thread. The only thing that is going…

No, I do think that happened and that the underpass was the more reasonable solution; why Caltrans required due to the bridge’s size and cost to have its completion be reliant on d…

Cutting and covering a few lanes at a time would not have cost $92 million. Even better, a horizontal drill would have less chance of lane closures than the bridge option.

I already saw that video and my comment reflects what he states that underpasses usually cheaper than overpasses like this (9:10); given that fact more (culverts - 9:30) could be b…

> having required 26 million pounds of concrete the height restriction alone should have been reason enough to go with a tunnel, but how could CA miss an opportunity for constructi…

[flagged]

> "As a result of increased production and economies of scale, we’re excited to announce we are able to lower the price to just $399 for the 16GB version and $499 for the 32GB vers…

not relevant to the inconsistency