Viewing profile — doubleunplussed
doubleunplussed
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Nov 28, 2016, 2:29 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,741
- Public activity
- 494 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About doubleunplussed
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47885071
I saw that too, but that's actually even worse on cache - the entire conversation is then a cache miss and needs to be loaded in in order to do the compaction. Then the resulting c…
-
comment
Comment #46625684
> "Someone did a CoC violation" is just a way for an org to say "someone was an asshole [...]" Not even that, since so many CoCs are vague enough that someone unprincipled wielding…
-
comment
Comment #46597034
That is true but requires some extra assumptions to explain why people don't keep losing weight - because the strongest influence on most people's appetite in the short run is how …
-
comment
Comment #45727910
One thing I hear people say in places DST was abolished is that the late sunrises in winter are similarly depressing, and that this is something not really appreciated by those who…
-
comment
Comment #44920059
I don't think you really understood my comment
-
comment
Comment #44920049
I didn't say it did, I said they're aware of it. Also thought it was worth pointing out that the LW "weird label" predates the label in the comment I replied to.
-
comment
Comment #44909473
I just mean that the existence of the human brain is proof that human-level intelligence is possible. Yes it took billions of years all said and done, but it shows that there are n…
-
comment
Comment #44909403
> "recursive self improvement" does not imply "self improvement without bounds" Obviously not, but thinking that the bounds are going to lie in between where AI intelligence is now…
-
comment
Comment #44909141
I think most in the rationality community (and otherwise in the know) would not say that IQ differences are almost entirely biological - I think they'd say they're about half genet…
-
comment
Comment #44884842
Certainly something they're aware of - the same concept was discussed as early as in 2007 on Less Wrong under the name "evaporative cooling of group beliefs" https://www.lesswrong.…
-
comment
Comment #44884807
I think you'll indeed find, if you were to seek out the relevant literature, that those claims are more or less true, or at least, are the currently best-supported interpretation a…
-
comment
Comment #44884667
How do you reconcile e.g. AlphaGo with the idea that data is a bottleneck? At some point learning can occur with "self-play", and I believe this is already happening with LLMs to s…
-
comment
Comment #44884277
Blocking people on Twitter doesn't necessarily imply intolerance of people who disagree with you. People often block for different reasons than disagreement.
-
comment
Comment #44884263
Many specific studies on the matter don't replicate, I think the book preceded the replication crisis so this is to be expected, but I don't think that negates the core idea that o…
-
comment
Comment #44884219
> The most powerful AI we have now is strictly hardware-dependent Of course that's the case and it always will be - the cutting edge is the cutting edge. But the best AI you can ru…
-
comment
Comment #44884170
I'm surprised not see see much pushback on your point here, so I'll provide my own. We have an existence proof for intelligence that can improve AI: humans can do this right now. D…
-
comment
Comment #44882486
I mean you have to admit that that's a bit of a kafkatrap
-
comment
Comment #44882367
On the other hand, I'm baffled to encounter recursive self-improvement being discussed as something not only weird to expect, but as damning evidence of sloppy thinking by those wh…
-
comment
Comment #44633732
Well, black-body radiation is still peaked around a certain range of wavelengths depending on the temperature, it's not just equal power at all wavelengths. Light visible to humans…
-
comment
Comment #44631268
I thought it was mostly that those are the wavelengths output out by the sun. But I guess it could be both.
-
comment
Comment #37045496
Andrew is mistaken, the paper he cites doesn't say that levitation is possible in a dipole field. Brauenbecker showed that diamagnetic levitation was possible at all (e.g. in a qua…
-
comment
Comment #36823000
Here in Australia, the regulator requires banks to assess your ability to make repayments at an interest rate three percentage points higher than the actual rate. A few years ago i…
-
comment
Comment #36751532
Yep. I just got diagnosed recently. Still figuring out the right dose of the right meds, but in the meantime it has become painfully obvious that a lot of discussion around product…
-
comment
Comment #36742042
See also, manifold, for a play-money predictions site based more around market mechanisms: https://manifold.markets Both sites come out of the same sort of rationalist bay-area cir…
-
comment
Comment #36557410
And in markdown you chuck them between backticks to indicate they're verbatim text to be rendered in monospace.