Viewing profile — door5
door5
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Sep 12, 2018, 3:12 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 154
- Public activity
- 139 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About door5
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- comment
-
comment
Comment #20010632
San Francisco absolutely does not need a racist[1] mayor. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop-and-frisk_in_New_York_Cit...
-
comment
Comment #19995660
Piracy is good but fascism is bad. What's the problem here?
-
comment
Comment #19985497
Capitalism has certain systemic features, one of them is concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a small few. Look at how wealth is concentrated in the U.S., especially o…
-
comment
Comment #19985286
Capitalism.
-
comment
Comment #19957674
That investment shouldn't be made by individuals, it should be made by society as a whole, ie by increasing taxes so tuition is free. The burden of student debt is not shared equal…
-
comment
Comment #19957655
I'm more upset that a single person has 5 billion dollars in the first place. Why don't we have a wealth tax on billionaires so that no one has student debt and we don't have to re…
-
comment
Comment #19957643
They would be say that an inheritance tax hurts "family farms" and "family businesses", because they are dishonest about the fact that their policies benefit the power and privileg…
-
comment
Comment #19926472
There is not one single way to publicly fund media. Hell you could just leave the whole system as is as provide no strings attached grants or tax credits to all publishers. The poi…
-
comment
Comment #19926356
> The only way to have free content is if the user is the product being sold. Or we could provide robust public funding, like the BBC > It's what we must accept if we don't want th…
-
comment
Comment #19906707
The U.S. president has been accused by multiple women of sexual assault. He has called women bitches, whores, fat pigs, ugly, etc. Multiple states in the south passed legislation e…
-
comment
Comment #19906684
I didn't frame it as men vs. women. I framed it as challenging patriarchy, which is a system and ideology of male dominance and control.
-
comment
Comment #19906666
No, I'm saying the economy rewards the choices men make. Women get paid less because employers pay less in female-dominated fields.
-
comment
Comment #19906243
Even if you assume all this research is correct, why are people with certain characteristics or interests that are disproportionately associated with women get rewarded less econom…
-
comment
Comment #19906224
It's not sexist to point out that men historically have held disproportionate cultural, social, economic, and political power and continue to do so to this day.
-
comment
Comment #19906148
I agree, however I think it's important that we do not use "implicit bias" as a cover. Implicit bias seems very vague and allows people to evade responsibility. I think there's a l…
-
comment
Comment #19906116
It isn't, there is an enormous body of evidence demonstrating that the gender pay gap is driven by overt sexism and institutional barriers. This evidence is far more compelling tha…
-
comment
Comment #19906085
Another way in which rigid, patriarchal gender roles hurt men as well as women. Straight men should be far more critical of sexism and misogyny than they are. This attitude is dire…
-
comment
Comment #19905933
There's a ton of overt misogyny and sexism in the U.S., nothing "subconscious" about it.
-
comment
Comment #19860069
Socialism is a material struggle, it isn't an idealist Utopia where everything is perfect. It's a process. And most socialist regimes have been in the developing world, which had m…
-
comment
Comment #19860027
This is ahistorical nonsense. The west industrialized hundreds of years ahead of the rest of the world and spent a century and a half plundering the global south. Regardless, China…
-
comment
Comment #19844134
>they are not the reason why there is still actual poverty and malnutrition in the western world. Why is there poverty and malnutrition in the western world if not because of capit…
-
comment
Comment #19843356
>Then why not focus on the anti-competitive behavior, instead of trying to remake the entire society in your leftist image? because my leftist image is good
-
comment
Comment #19839707
We could do this all day, but the fundamental difference here is you look at the normal functioning of capitalism and think it is just and good, while I look at it and see it as hi…
-
comment
Comment #19839055
You ignored my point - that the concentration of wealth is an inhibitor of solving poverty, and you failed to explain why you feel the need to defend billionaires' interests when t…