Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — doop

doop

HN member
Joined
Fri, Apr 29, 2011, 5:03 PM UTC
HN karma
30
Public activity
16 items

About doop

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #44443559

    I don't think it really helps - you're already working in something like a probabilistic formulation. If you want to use a quantum mechanical justification for it then you need to …

  2. comment
    Comment #44442223

    It's lost at Boltzmann's "molecular chaos" or "Stosszahlansatz" step. If f(x1,x2) is the two-particle distribution function giving you (hand-wavingly) the probability that you have…

  3. comment
    Comment #44151039

    Laser C or Lattice C maybe?

  4. comment
    Comment #43149199

    Why does this otherwise excellent series always depict electrons as red and protons as blue when everybody knows it’s the other way round?

  5. comment
    Comment #39789507

    The Falcon was a nice machine (I still have one!) although it suffered from the characteristic Atari penny-pinching: still no MIDI thru port (on a machine which was otherwise amazi…

  6. comment
    Comment #35903306

    This page was written by Anu Dudhia, who for many years was celebrated by the giant graffiti saying "ANU IS GOD" on the side of Donnington Bridge in Oxford.

  7. comment
    Comment #34861903

    Find a style of music you enjoy listening to, then go to a club that plays it, and start dancing. Keep doing that. You might find that your taste shifts a bit over time, and that's…

  8. comment
    Comment #34857701

    Great article! Also: > I’ve never heard of a family being divided because its members dance different styles Anyone who believes this needs to go watch Strictly Ballroom (1992) wit…

  9. comment
    Comment #28536308

    My favourite example of this is.. Robocop! https://dejareviewer.com/2014/04/29/cinematic-chiasmus-roboc...

  10. comment
    Comment #25134605

    Is this the Wayne Holder of Dungeon Master fame?

  11. comment
    Comment #22683023

    I remember the Snow Crash MOO! I spent a while there around 1996-1997: it was (despite the name) sort of William Gibson themed - I vaguely remember it being distributed across mult…

  12. comment
    Comment #6730811

    Err, no it doesn't - the viscosity in LB is a function purely of the relaxation time (for LBGK anyway). Nor do you need to do any simulation repeats to average out the noise. The m…

  13. comment
    Comment #6729396

    Off the top of my head (it's quite a while..), lattice gas models wind up giving you a velocity-dependent viscosity, i.e. the viscosity of the fluid is a function of how fast it is…

  14. comment
    Comment #6728896

    They might not be strictly Navier-Stokes but the way in which real fluids deviate from N-S is completely unlike the way in which lattice gas fluids deviate from N-S. Absolutely, yo…

  15. comment
    Comment #6728531

    You can see it as continuum-ing up from a CA, or you can see it as a discretization of the continuum Boltzmann equation. What do you mean you don't need Galilean invariance? In the…

  16. comment
    Comment #6728201

    I was under the impression that lattice gas methods in CFD were more or less obsolete. They're nice in that they're unconditionally stable and only use bitwise operations, but the …