Viewing profile — doop
doop
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Apr 29, 2011, 5:03 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 30
- Public activity
- 16 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About doop
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #44443559
I don't think it really helps - you're already working in something like a probabilistic formulation. If you want to use a quantum mechanical justification for it then you need to …
-
comment
Comment #44442223
It's lost at Boltzmann's "molecular chaos" or "Stosszahlansatz" step. If f(x1,x2) is the two-particle distribution function giving you (hand-wavingly) the probability that you have…
-
comment
Comment #44151039
Laser C or Lattice C maybe?
-
comment
Comment #43149199
Why does this otherwise excellent series always depict electrons as red and protons as blue when everybody knows it’s the other way round?
-
comment
Comment #39789507
The Falcon was a nice machine (I still have one!) although it suffered from the characteristic Atari penny-pinching: still no MIDI thru port (on a machine which was otherwise amazi…
-
comment
Comment #35903306
This page was written by Anu Dudhia, who for many years was celebrated by the giant graffiti saying "ANU IS GOD" on the side of Donnington Bridge in Oxford.
-
comment
Comment #34861903
Find a style of music you enjoy listening to, then go to a club that plays it, and start dancing. Keep doing that. You might find that your taste shifts a bit over time, and that's…
-
comment
Comment #34857701
Great article! Also: > I’ve never heard of a family being divided because its members dance different styles Anyone who believes this needs to go watch Strictly Ballroom (1992) wit…
-
comment
Comment #28536308
My favourite example of this is.. Robocop! https://dejareviewer.com/2014/04/29/cinematic-chiasmus-roboc...
-
comment
Comment #25134605
Is this the Wayne Holder of Dungeon Master fame?
-
comment
Comment #22683023
I remember the Snow Crash MOO! I spent a while there around 1996-1997: it was (despite the name) sort of William Gibson themed - I vaguely remember it being distributed across mult…
-
comment
Comment #6730811
Err, no it doesn't - the viscosity in LB is a function purely of the relaxation time (for LBGK anyway). Nor do you need to do any simulation repeats to average out the noise. The m…
-
comment
Comment #6729396
Off the top of my head (it's quite a while..), lattice gas models wind up giving you a velocity-dependent viscosity, i.e. the viscosity of the fluid is a function of how fast it is…
-
comment
Comment #6728896
They might not be strictly Navier-Stokes but the way in which real fluids deviate from N-S is completely unlike the way in which lattice gas fluids deviate from N-S. Absolutely, yo…
-
comment
Comment #6728531
You can see it as continuum-ing up from a CA, or you can see it as a discretization of the continuum Boltzmann equation. What do you mean you don't need Galilean invariance? In the…
-
comment
Comment #6728201
I was under the impression that lattice gas methods in CFD were more or less obsolete. They're nice in that they're unconditionally stable and only use bitwise operations, but the …