Viewing profile — doom
doom
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Nov 14, 2014, 6:44 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 18
- Public activity
- 10 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About doom
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #27346533
> why wouldn't you do it on a (performant) blockchain I don't see value here over JP Morgan Chase operating the market as a neutral third party. Maybe Chase won't really be neutral…
-
comment
Comment #27346444
You propose a world where cyberchuck tokens are useless, but cyberchuck crypto tokens are readily traded on the open market. Cashing out requires people to value the token undernea…
-
comment
Comment #27341229
They suppose both parties have equal power (money, ability to analyze the smart contract). I doubt most contract negotiations are like that. Signing a smart contract with Google, w…
-
comment
Comment #27341207
Would the government mandate an inane proof of work scheme so that the energy usage goes up YoY every year?
-
comment
Comment #27341189
Can you explain why I need a crypto(tm) Gitcoin and not just a cyber chuck e cheese token? I give cyber-chuck $1 and he gives me 1 cyber token. I can subdivide it 10,000 times and …
-
comment
Comment #27341156
There is no reason whatsoever for Activision to join forces with Epic and let your Call of Duty gun skins cross over to Fortnite. Even if they do, both titans will never in a milli…
-
comment
Comment #27341125
I've evaluated Bitcoin probably 10 separate times. I regret not getting in at time #1 when it was $30, but I know I would've sold at $35 or $50 or $100 or $1000 based on where I wa…
-
comment
Comment #27341019
Patently false. Bitcoin put a dollar value on under-utlized energy. That can be coal, hydro, whatever. If you believe that Bitcoin is just a more wasteful version of Paypal or ACH,…
-
comment
Comment #27340936
> Crypto gives the ability for the community to actually control and be confident they won’t get slowly squeezed out, because you can actually codify control. This is nonsense. Sur…
-
comment
Comment #8606133
I totally disagree on the "link aggregator" assessment. I've been a redditor since late 2007 / early 2008. It originally appealed to me because it was a link aggregator. The links …