Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — donttrustatoms

donttrustatoms

HN member
Joined
Tue, May 27, 2014, 5:51 AM UTC
HN karma
206
Public activity
53 items

About donttrustatoms

COO/cofounder Oklo BS mechanical engineering BA economics MS nuclear engineering MIT

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #29974478

    I edited the above comment instead of replying here (whoops). I realized that you thought the structure was glass. No wonder. It's not, it's steel panels. Modular construction. The…

  2. comment
    Comment #29974451

    Haha not really. :) I was pretty much laughing at myself, responding to the commenter's idea that Oklo leadership shouldn't be spending cycles on building parameters with architect…

  3. comment
    Comment #29974406

    Thanks for the followup as well. I'll just respond on a couple of the points: - you don't see these detailed core schematics with analyses because in our design they are designated…

  4. comment
    Comment #29944500

    I can't say what kinds of security analyses we had to do to meet regulatory requirements, because there's a host of things you have to do to even know what security requirements th…

  5. comment
    Comment #29944363

    You're exactly right here, and I'd say this is well put in several areas. I'll add that supercritical CO2 sounds like science fiction to people, but it's actually been pretty well …

  6. comment
    Comment #29944206

    It's a good thing then that we analyzed to such extreme events as completely losing everything above ground, whether due to an avalanche, a tornado, an earthquake, etc, etc. :) The…

  7. comment
    Comment #29944150

    Hey Gloriana, I'm sure PR experts would say I'm probably not making a good decision responding here, and I haven't even had anything to drink, but I'll take a stab at sharing a bit…

  8. comment
    Comment #29943998

    Fair point, but when we examined just having everything underground, it was more expensive actually. Once you consider operational realities in a remote environment (especially in …

  9. comment
    Comment #29943977

    It would seem that both could be possible, but you're the expert here. ;) We didn't have to spend much time or money on an actually nice looking design, and the a-frame has a lot o…

  10. comment
    Comment #29943956

    It's a good conjecture, Paul. One might assume that low probability events were a major issue. With a design that is first of a kind, and given that the proven inherent safety char…

  11. comment
    Comment #29943870

    NuScale will, after about 15 years of engagement, receive a design certification later in 2022. After that- they will still need to apply with a combined license application like O…

  12. job
  13. comment
    Comment #22402502

    I'm the cofounder of Oklo. Thanks for submitting this to HN! Feel free to AMA. :)

  14. comment
    Comment #22402500

    I'm the cofounder of Oklo. Thanks for submitting this to HN! Feel free to AMA.

  15. comment
    Comment #17849728

    "Fast reactors have always had this potential problem" - Not really. Check out the dramatic experiments at EBR-II (fast reactor) demonstrating unprotected loss of coolant at full p…

  16. comment
    Comment #17849708

    The link clearly states that this is the MCFR - Molten Chloride Fast Reactor. I think the confusion may lie in that people equate fast reactor with sodium. It's a fast MSR.

  17. comment
    Comment #11251168

    Oklo.com. You can sign up for the mailing list there, for updates once info goes live.

  18. comment
    Comment #11251161

    Massive batteries is an idiotic idea, as you said. Which is why the constant and large and instantaneous fluctuations from solar and wind are smoothed largely by natural gas. Recom…

  19. comment
    Comment #11251146

    Ha ha. Wrong. Actually the biggest demand is remote communities currently burning lots and lots of diesel. Military is way, way too slow moving.

  20. story
  21. story
  22. comment
    Comment #9809500

    Solar is much cheaper and wind was already cheap, however the question, for both carbon and cost, is what is the price of the renewable intermittents with storage and backup. Batte…

  23. comment
    Comment #9809281

    Good question, and believe it or not there have been small reactor concepts that failed for not considering that exact point. Ours is designed to live in essentially a spent fuel c…

  24. comment
    Comment #9809164

    The short answer is yes. We see this as our Tesla roadster (well designed niche product for a market willing to pay, in this case however, desperately in need for a solution that d…

  25. comment
    Comment #9801870

    That makes sense given those numbers tabulated, but the real question is cost of solar plus backup or storage. One means nothing without the other in terms of both cost and carbon.…