Viewing profile — dontlikeyoueith
dontlikeyoueith
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jun 12, 2024, 4:28 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 323
- Public activity
- 160 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About dontlikeyoueith
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48493720
It's an optimal first order approximation. Anything anyone with a capital-C in their job title says in public should be assumed to be marketing material.
-
comment
Comment #48484487
Snake oil scam. They simply don't do what the label on the box says they do.
-
comment
Comment #48484480
The sooner the better.
-
comment
Comment #48484436
The models are still useful bumbling fools. We're in the flat part of the curve because we've exhausted existing data sources.
-
comment
Comment #48484423
I disagree with your assessment pretty strongly -- the models themselves hit a wall over a year ago once companies exhausted all existing training data. LLMs don't induce world mod…
-
comment
Comment #48465336
> OpenAI and Anthropic are heavily subsidizing their inference -- no wait, they are charging the most they can get away with before going public. Where is the truth? Both. They are…
-
comment
Comment #48373499
> As an employer, I want AI to be fully allowed for assignments, and the assignments to be made trickier to compensate. This is like saying first graders should learn to use calcul…
-
comment
Comment #48057681
> The NLA would be forced to use human readable representations to get a successful round trip. That still doesn't guarantee any semantic correspondence between the human readable …
-
comment
Comment #47768472
> LLMs are based on neural networks, so one could create an interface where activating certain neurons triggers tool calls, with other neurons encoding the inputs; another set of n…
-
comment
Comment #47768410
> I think the point the GP was trying to make is that the GitHub UI ought to be able to allow you to submit a branch with multiple well-organized commits and review each commit sep…
-
comment
Comment #47768345
Why do you insist on a different but functionally equivalent solution to the problem? It's weird. > Why do we tolerate the fact that GitHub doesn't let you say "approved for change…
-
comment
Comment #47768068
Depends on what you consider long-lived. I typically generate stacks of 3-5 PRs in 1-2 days now (in a gen-AI world).
-
comment
Comment #47768046
Because sometimes there are changes that need to land as all or nothing.
-
comment
Comment #47724665
> When competing for resources, killing your neighbour frees up resources, which you can take. Most species of animal and even plants do this to some extent. If anything, I'd say p…
-
comment
Comment #47724618
There's been a massive step change in their capability per unit cost. What used to cost millions per unit now costs tens of thousands. That's significant. It's like saying artiller…
-
comment
Comment #47633016
> Catering to their loudest supporters Name one instance of this actually happening. I'll wait.
-
comment
Comment #47622471
Calling "reasoning tokens" "thinking" is a complete confusion of concepts on your part.
-
comment
Comment #47617473
Nope. It's only surprising to people who still think they're going to build God out of LLMs.
-
comment
Comment #47460168
No, it's significantly more complex.
-
comment
Comment #47460134
They are referring to Hetch Hetchy.
-
comment
Comment #46559325
How about critiquing the actual recommendation instead of the people?
-
comment
Comment #46277950
Too bad they voted to eliminate accountability for businesses that poison people. Now they get to find out.
-
comment
Comment #46277829
I have a Miele canister vacuum. I love it. My wife bought the Dyson garbage anyway because she can't ignore her instagram feed.
-
comment
Comment #46246109
> Refuse to express uncertainty or nuance (i asked ChatGPT to give me certainty %s which it did for a while but then just forgot...?) They're literally incapable of this. Any numbe…
-
comment
Comment #46213129
You're hallucinating things I did not say.