Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — dontlikeyoueith

dontlikeyoueith

HN member
Joined
Wed, Jun 12, 2024, 4:28 PM UTC
HN karma
323
Public activity
160 items

About dontlikeyoueith

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48493720

    It's an optimal first order approximation. Anything anyone with a capital-C in their job title says in public should be assumed to be marketing material.

  2. comment
    Comment #48484487

    Snake oil scam. They simply don't do what the label on the box says they do.

  3. comment
    Comment #48484480

    The sooner the better.

  4. comment
    Comment #48484436

    The models are still useful bumbling fools. We're in the flat part of the curve because we've exhausted existing data sources.

  5. comment
    Comment #48484423

    I disagree with your assessment pretty strongly -- the models themselves hit a wall over a year ago once companies exhausted all existing training data. LLMs don't induce world mod…

  6. comment
    Comment #48465336

    > OpenAI and Anthropic are heavily subsidizing their inference -- no wait, they are charging the most they can get away with before going public. Where is the truth? Both. They are…

  7. comment
    Comment #48373499

    > As an employer, I want AI to be fully allowed for assignments, and the assignments to be made trickier to compensate. This is like saying first graders should learn to use calcul…

  8. comment
    Comment #48057681

    > The NLA would be forced to use human readable representations to get a successful round trip. That still doesn't guarantee any semantic correspondence between the human readable …

  9. comment
    Comment #47768472

    > LLMs are based on neural networks, so one could create an interface where activating certain neurons triggers tool calls, with other neurons encoding the inputs; another set of n…

  10. comment
    Comment #47768410

    > I think the point the GP was trying to make is that the GitHub UI ought to be able to allow you to submit a branch with multiple well-organized commits and review each commit sep…

  11. comment
    Comment #47768345

    Why do you insist on a different but functionally equivalent solution to the problem? It's weird. > Why do we tolerate the fact that GitHub doesn't let you say "approved for change…

  12. comment
    Comment #47768068

    Depends on what you consider long-lived. I typically generate stacks of 3-5 PRs in 1-2 days now (in a gen-AI world).

  13. comment
    Comment #47768046

    Because sometimes there are changes that need to land as all or nothing.

  14. comment
    Comment #47724665

    > When competing for resources, killing your neighbour frees up resources, which you can take. Most species of animal and even plants do this to some extent. If anything, I'd say p…

  15. comment
    Comment #47724618

    There's been a massive step change in their capability per unit cost. What used to cost millions per unit now costs tens of thousands. That's significant. It's like saying artiller…

  16. comment
    Comment #47633016

    > Catering to their loudest supporters Name one instance of this actually happening. I'll wait.

  17. comment
    Comment #47622471

    Calling "reasoning tokens" "thinking" is a complete confusion of concepts on your part.

  18. comment
    Comment #47617473

    Nope. It's only surprising to people who still think they're going to build God out of LLMs.

  19. comment
    Comment #47460168

    No, it's significantly more complex.

  20. comment
    Comment #47460134

    They are referring to Hetch Hetchy.

  21. comment
    Comment #46559325

    How about critiquing the actual recommendation instead of the people?

  22. comment
    Comment #46277950

    Too bad they voted to eliminate accountability for businesses that poison people. Now they get to find out.

  23. comment
    Comment #46277829

    I have a Miele canister vacuum. I love it. My wife bought the Dyson garbage anyway because she can't ignore her instagram feed.

  24. comment
    Comment #46246109

    > Refuse to express uncertainty or nuance (i asked ChatGPT to give me certainty %s which it did for a while but then just forgot...?) They're literally incapable of this. Any numbe…

  25. comment
    Comment #46213129

    You're hallucinating things I did not say.