Viewing profile — dongobread
dongobread
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Dec 06, 2022, 6:56 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 670
- Public activity
- 45 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About dongobread
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46979661
What a strangely hostile statement on an open weight model. Running like 20 benchmark evaluations isn't trivial by itself, and even updating visuals and press statements can take a…
-
comment
Comment #44805313
It is absolutely awful at writing and general knowledge. IMO coding is its greatest strength by far.
-
comment
Comment #44805294
How up to date are you on current open weights models? After playing around with it for a few hours I find it to be nowhere near as good as Qwen3-30B-A3B. The world knowledge is se…
-
comment
Comment #44486742
This is a little misleading. The data they quote is based on their previous article[1], which just uses this analysis[2] provided by a VC company. Funnily enough the same VC compan…
-
comment
Comment #44272234
The corporate politics at Meta is the result of Zuck's own decisions. Even in big tech, Meta is (along with Amazon) rather famous for its highly political and backstabby culture. T…
-
comment
Comment #43637891
The US has crashed its own stock market, tanked its own government's approval ratings, and had its own business leaders speak out against the government. This definitely does not i…
-
comment
Comment #41428961
The paragraph immediately after that paragraph explains that the study was based off faulty analysis (and links to the below article). https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/6/4/1…
-
comment
Comment #41187239
I'm very skeptical on this, the paper they linked is not convincing. It says that GPT-4 is correct at predicting the experiment outcome direction 69% of the time versus 66% of the …
-
comment
Comment #40980855
They definitely would and do, the vast majority of time series work is not about asset prices or beating the stock market
-
comment
Comment #40980574
I think what you say is true when comparing transformers to CNNs/RNNs, but not to MLPs. Transformers, RNNs, and CNNs are all techniques to reduce parameter count compared to a pure…
-
comment
Comment #40980151
From experience in payments/spending forecasting, I've found that deep learning generally underperform gradient-boosted tree models. Deep learning models tend to be good at learnin…
-
comment
Comment #40921583
I get what this piece is trying to say, but it's ignoring the fact that schools are trying to maximize learning with pupils who often don't want or care about learning (unlike with…
-
comment
Comment #40817272
I'm not sure what would lead to you believe this. I've worked in the data science/ML space for over a decade now and I see the majority of pure analytics projects started in R, inc…
-
comment
Comment #40813385
The knowledge distillation is very interesting but generating trillions of outputs from a large teacher model seems insanely expensive. Is this really more cost efficient than just…
-
comment
Comment #40745397
Langchain feels very much like shovelware that was created for the sole purpose of parting VCs of their money. At one point the codebase had a "prompt template" class that literall…
-
comment
Comment #40713689
I'm skeptical of that. Most western Europe countries have similarly low birth rates to Japan despite having some of the lowest working hours in the world.
-
comment
Comment #40467078
Assuming you already know some basic linear algebra and calculus, know Python (or R), and have a decent-but-not-advanced grasp of statistics, I'd recommend working through these bo…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #40395550
We tried using a multi-agent system for a complex NLP-type task and we found: - Too many errors that just propogate on top of each other, if a single agent in the chain generates s…
-
comment
Comment #40344589
Their benchmark results seem roughly on par with Mistral 7B and Llama 3 8B, which hardly seems that great given the increase in model size. https://huggingface.co/tiiuae/falcon-11B…
-
comment
Comment #40320929
Legality aside, I think the "payment" people get from posting free knowledge on the Internet is the human connection, and the satisfaction of knowing that other people are reading …
-
comment
Comment #39698627
Seems sort of misleading marketing as it seems to imply 1% of GDP = 1% of transactions. By that metric there's probably 5-10 companies who each process 5%+ of world GDP - e.g. http…
-
comment
Comment #38563924
I don't think either of those theories is right. (1) doesn't explain the rise in corporate profits, and (2) is of course silly. Here is my theory: Consumers generally have an "acce…
-
comment
Comment #38549515
This isn't apples to apples - they're taking the optimal prompting technique for their own model, then using that technique for both models. They should be comparing it against the…
- comment