Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — dongcarl

dongcarl

HN member
Joined
Wed, Oct 05, 2016, 1:42 AM UTC
HN karma
182
Public activity
69 items

About dongcarl

Building obscura.com

Recent public activity

  1. story
  2. comment
    Comment #48726389

    Appreciate the shoutout! :-)

  3. comment
    Comment #48726240

    Thanks for the shoutout!

  4. story
  5. comment
    Comment #48152911

    Heh yeah we just check for a Mullvad exit IP, it's one way you know we're actually relaying to Mullvad!

  6. comment
    Comment #48151547

    Carl here (Obscura CEO, one of Mullvad's partners) This was an interesting finding, though as kfreds mentioned it would have been better to notify the vendor before publishing. The…

  7. story
  8. comment
    Comment #45508203

    > should Chat Control not pass Unfortunately in the world we live in no single jurisdiction is good enough anymore, laws can always change and Chat Control can be re-proposed over …

  9. comment
    Comment #45508158

    We've had many reports that it works. In fact, one of our users told us he took an hour video call over Obscura in China and things worked smoothly! Unfortunately, because we don't…

  10. comment
    Comment #45508134

    You could probably implement a pluggable transport for it?

  11. comment
    Comment #45508126

    Ah that's excellent! Do you have a link to the thesis?

  12. comment
    Comment #45497820

    Yes, you can with Obscura. That limitation of Private Relay is just an arbitrary limitation made by Apple.

  13. comment
    Comment #45497218

    We should really be moving towards a world of Multi-Party Relays rather than Single-Party VPN operators: https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2024/11/17/where-are-... With Multi-…

  14. comment
    Comment #45395858

    Actually, they don’t need to do a reverse lookup at all. They can just look at the TLS SNI field and the hostname is there in plaintext. It’s _more_ trouble to do the reverse looku…

  15. comment
    Comment #45279387

    If you can't see your VPN's source code, you can almost safely assume that they're broken in some way.

  16. comment
    Comment #45128790

    It's trusting A OR B, rather than A AND B

  17. comment
    Comment #45120417

    Yup, when you're not using a VPN, even with encrypted DNS and HTTPS, you're still sending hostnames (e.g. wikileaks.org) over plaintext in TLS SNI for every HTTPS connection. I bel…

  18. comment
    Comment #45119937

    I'm surprised no one has mentioned iCloud Relay-style Multi-Party Relays yet: https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2024/11/17/where-are-... It greatly improves on the existing VP…

  19. comment
    Comment #45070068

    We're working on it! Android is next :-)

  20. comment
    Comment #45056255

    We should link it in more places, apologies! Here it is: https://github.com/Sovereign-Engineering/obscuravpn-client

  21. comment
    Comment #45055742

    Very possible, though many of our users are saying that in network environments where WireGuard is blocked they were able to use Obscura.

  22. comment
    Comment #45054975

    Give Obscura a try, we get around internet restrictions by using QUIC as transport, which looks like HTTP/3 and doesn't suffer from TCP-over-TCP meltdown: https://obscura.net/ Tech…

  23. comment
    Comment #44942011

    I actually spent a few months prototyping SGX/SEV VPNs before settling on a Multi-Party Relay scheme for obscura.net Things may have changed since mid-2023 but here were my takeawa…

  24. comment
    Comment #44553727

    At Obscura we just tunnel WireGuard over QUIC's unreliable datagram mechanism to make it look like HTTP/3 (for DPI): https://github.com/Sovereign-Engineering/obscuravpn-client/b...…

  25. comment
    Comment #44350998

    I think he's just talking about using Mullvad's [DNS servers]( https://mullvad.net/en/help/dns-over-https-and-dns-over-tls ), which work in most cases.