Viewing profile — dongcarl
dongcarl
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Oct 05, 2016, 1:42 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 182
- Public activity
- 69 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About dongcarl
Recent public activity
- story
-
comment
Comment #48726389
Appreciate the shoutout! :-)
-
comment
Comment #48726240
Thanks for the shoutout!
- story
-
comment
Comment #48152911
Heh yeah we just check for a Mullvad exit IP, it's one way you know we're actually relaying to Mullvad!
-
comment
Comment #48151547
Carl here (Obscura CEO, one of Mullvad's partners) This was an interesting finding, though as kfreds mentioned it would have been better to notify the vendor before publishing. The…
- story
-
comment
Comment #45508203
> should Chat Control not pass Unfortunately in the world we live in no single jurisdiction is good enough anymore, laws can always change and Chat Control can be re-proposed over …
-
comment
Comment #45508158
We've had many reports that it works. In fact, one of our users told us he took an hour video call over Obscura in China and things worked smoothly! Unfortunately, because we don't…
-
comment
Comment #45508134
You could probably implement a pluggable transport for it?
-
comment
Comment #45508126
Ah that's excellent! Do you have a link to the thesis?
-
comment
Comment #45497820
Yes, you can with Obscura. That limitation of Private Relay is just an arbitrary limitation made by Apple.
-
comment
Comment #45497218
We should really be moving towards a world of Multi-Party Relays rather than Single-Party VPN operators: https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2024/11/17/where-are-... With Multi-…
-
comment
Comment #45395858
Actually, they don’t need to do a reverse lookup at all. They can just look at the TLS SNI field and the hostname is there in plaintext. It’s _more_ trouble to do the reverse looku…
-
comment
Comment #45279387
If you can't see your VPN's source code, you can almost safely assume that they're broken in some way.
-
comment
Comment #45128790
It's trusting A OR B, rather than A AND B
-
comment
Comment #45120417
Yup, when you're not using a VPN, even with encrypted DNS and HTTPS, you're still sending hostnames (e.g. wikileaks.org) over plaintext in TLS SNI for every HTTPS connection. I bel…
-
comment
Comment #45119937
I'm surprised no one has mentioned iCloud Relay-style Multi-Party Relays yet: https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2024/11/17/where-are-... It greatly improves on the existing VP…
-
comment
Comment #45070068
We're working on it! Android is next :-)
-
comment
Comment #45056255
We should link it in more places, apologies! Here it is: https://github.com/Sovereign-Engineering/obscuravpn-client
-
comment
Comment #45055742
Very possible, though many of our users are saying that in network environments where WireGuard is blocked they were able to use Obscura.
-
comment
Comment #45054975
Give Obscura a try, we get around internet restrictions by using QUIC as transport, which looks like HTTP/3 and doesn't suffer from TCP-over-TCP meltdown: https://obscura.net/ Tech…
-
comment
Comment #44942011
I actually spent a few months prototyping SGX/SEV VPNs before settling on a Multi-Party Relay scheme for obscura.net Things may have changed since mid-2023 but here were my takeawa…
-
comment
Comment #44553727
At Obscura we just tunnel WireGuard over QUIC's unreliable datagram mechanism to make it look like HTTP/3 (for DPI): https://github.com/Sovereign-Engineering/obscuravpn-client/b...…
-
comment
Comment #44350998
I think he's just talking about using Mullvad's [DNS servers]( https://mullvad.net/en/help/dns-over-https-and-dns-over-tls ), which work in most cases.