Viewing profile — dogber1
dogber1
HN member- Joined
- Wed, May 02, 2012, 7:32 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 190
- Public activity
- 20 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About dogber1
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #29574164
Better gate control results in lower leakage compared to fins, and there are probably also some better thermals associated with this approach due to the surrounding metals. However…
-
comment
Comment #29386464
And on top of that, you can make almost any material lase. There have been entertaining experiments where folks used yogurt, apple juice, hair dye, and other fun liquids in pumped …
-
comment
Comment #28926799
I'm afraid that's not even remotely true. Just two counterexamples: - MLC flash storage devices use multiple levels to store/retrieve bits [1], - Lots of control systems are implem…
-
comment
Comment #28926727
That's indeed done all the time in electronics: for example, RF CMOS usually trailing on a node three or four generations behind the bleeding edge. However, all-optical/photonic co…
-
comment
Comment #28926660
In principle, yes, but: - lower wavelength light is harder to confine within waveguides (or transmissive optics), and messes up atoms when colliding (think of x-rays), - finding an…
-
comment
Comment #28926402
Switching/routing usually requires significant information processing (e.g. decode packet header, match destination address against routing tables, etc.). This necessitates 10k or …
-
comment
Comment #28926343
No - that's just a neat trick to enhance the precision in the measurement of non-commuting observable quantities of interest.
-
comment
Comment #28926250
In reality, all-optical computing is mostly a terrible idea: fundamentally, it cannot reach the integration density of electronics. It boils down to the elementary differences betw…
-
comment
Comment #27647117
That is an extremely common practice in the industry. Every large chip design house does this to maximize line yield - it is called "binning" [1]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki…
-
comment
Comment #24324003
No, that's just some marketing verbiage with no real physical correspondence.
-
comment
Comment #24320847
So many hyperbolic claims that boil down to a moderate 33% area benefit with very little data about mundane things like long-term reliability, or process variation. Every time an a…
-
comment
Comment #23405231
Linearity, on-state loss, pole-to-pole isolation, and breakdown will be atrocious. It makes for a nice clickbaity publication though.
-
comment
Comment #22411028
That's a great re-implementation from some stuff I did eons ago [0]. BIOS passwords are indeed a complete joke as means to secure access. There are a bunch of vendors out there who…
-
comment
Comment #12333844
I do not understand the proclaimed 3X increase of design cost per finfet node, particularly in the context of digital ICs. Most cell designs are highly repetitive, so the increased…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #11976363
The bypass algorithms have largely remained unchanged when the industry moved to EFI. Most vendors (Lenovo, Dell, Acer, Asus, Toshiba, Fujitsu, ...) simply wrapped their bypass alg…
-
comment
Comment #11975211
Apple is doing a much better job than all the rest of the PC vendors. Even those vendors that I haven't published keygens for [1] have just stupendously unsound bypass mechanisms f…
-
comment
Comment #8933802
No, it won't: on the length scale of a chip, the power efficiency of an electrical-optical-electrical transmission line is an order of magnitude worse than direct electrical transm…
-
comment
Comment #6515927
The GPU is still an ARM Mali T6xx which is mostly unsupported, i.e. removing Chrome OS and running "pure" linux is going to be dreadfully slow for lack of 2D/3D acceleration. It's …
-
comment
Comment #6512088
If you get around replacing chrome OS with linux and reflashing the firmware with uboot, you'll lose GPU acceleration (3D and 2D). ARM is pretty shitty about releasing specs for th…