Viewing profile — doc_ick
doc_ick
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Dec 06, 2025, 4:06 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 23
- Public activity
- 77 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About doc_ick
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49223982
It’d be more like “car accidents occur, so let’s add seat belts, air bags, etc…”.
-
comment
Comment #49212891
That truly is sad, as execution and even distribution is just now a prompt with a credit card.
-
comment
Comment #49212840
100%
-
comment
Comment #49212836
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #49163836
Likely not using / managing context windows properly and then having it re-read data it’s already gone through
-
comment
Comment #49163805
I was about to say as well, I don’t think I’d be interested in ever using this project but now I definitely never will. I wonder if they are vibe coding this for humans but have di…
-
comment
Comment #49163736
Your idea is my source code.
-
comment
Comment #49163719
Going down that trail, eventually ai will eventually learn how to manage merge conflicts better (or whatever new scam). Or it could simply rewrite its own fork and support it all w…
-
comment
Comment #49163685
Very true.
-
comment
Comment #49156664
I disagree. As if a tool is customized via agents and something goes wrong, it should be the users issue to fix it. Say I want to customize a bank app (or sca tool) to use a nickna…
-
comment
Comment #49041623
What about the blue line indicates that? The blue line did not indicate anything to me as there’s no flow.
-
comment
Comment #49041585
Except in this case for this app you’re simply complaining that your app is rejected on “being ai”. I am also on team Apple, as I have no idea what this app actually does.
-
comment
Comment #49033026
I mean, if you don’t think about it that’s true.
-
comment
Comment #49032980
In the ai-article op did say they’d do exactly that. Though it is surprising they left GitHub due to ““enshittification” of the platform under Microsoft’s ownership”, when it’s lik…
-
comment
Comment #48958372
I doubt it.
-
comment
Comment #48941953
Anecdotal
-
comment
Comment #48941894
Ah, thank you!
-
comment
Comment #48936775
Do you have a source link for the >5000 companies?
-
comment
Comment #48934559
Source?
-
comment
Comment #48933966
So you’re saying there’s no data to group these settings by editions.
-
comment
Comment #48929383
Ditto with this, if arxiv is just a hosting site then what’s different then a personal GitHub site hosting your paper? Ai and Google would pick it up eventually.
-
comment
Comment #48929374
I’d say these are reasonable settings for most uses. Though do you know of surveys that back this up? I don’t mean to nit pick too much, I’d just like to see common uses and the da…
-
comment
Comment #48896173
Hmm, I am surprised to hear it’s understood to be exponential, but thanks for the reference. I will read up on it.
-
comment
Comment #48895946
“And here we found the culprit. The paper I was submitting belongs under cs.CY, Computers and Society, as I now know after reviewing all the categories more carefully.” I’d think t…
-
comment
Comment #48895824
With the rise of ai, ai-based papers, and ais writing terrible papers; why are you surprised or frustrated? Wouldn’t you want some kind of barrier against slop?