Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — doc_ick

doc_ick

HN member
Joined
Sat, Dec 06, 2025, 4:06 PM UTC
HN karma
23
Public activity
77 items

About doc_ick

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49223982

    It’d be more like “car accidents occur, so let’s add seat belts, air bags, etc…”.

  2. comment
    Comment #49212891

    That truly is sad, as execution and even distribution is just now a prompt with a credit card.

  3. comment
  4. comment
  5. comment
    Comment #49163836

    Likely not using / managing context windows properly and then having it re-read data it’s already gone through

  6. comment
    Comment #49163805

    I was about to say as well, I don’t think I’d be interested in ever using this project but now I definitely never will. I wonder if they are vibe coding this for humans but have di…

  7. comment
    Comment #49163736

    Your idea is my source code.

  8. comment
    Comment #49163719

    Going down that trail, eventually ai will eventually learn how to manage merge conflicts better (or whatever new scam). Or it could simply rewrite its own fork and support it all w…

  9. comment
    Comment #49163685

    Very true.

  10. comment
    Comment #49156664

    I disagree. As if a tool is customized via agents and something goes wrong, it should be the users issue to fix it. Say I want to customize a bank app (or sca tool) to use a nickna…

  11. comment
    Comment #49041623

    What about the blue line indicates that? The blue line did not indicate anything to me as there’s no flow.

  12. comment
    Comment #49041585

    Except in this case for this app you’re simply complaining that your app is rejected on “being ai”. I am also on team Apple, as I have no idea what this app actually does.

  13. comment
    Comment #49033026

    I mean, if you don’t think about it that’s true.

  14. comment
    Comment #49032980

    In the ai-article op did say they’d do exactly that. Though it is surprising they left GitHub due to ““enshittification” of the platform under Microsoft’s ownership”, when it’s lik…

  15. comment
    Comment #48958372

    I doubt it.

  16. comment
    Comment #48941953

    Anecdotal

  17. comment
    Comment #48941894

    Ah, thank you!

  18. comment
    Comment #48936775

    Do you have a source link for the >5000 companies?

  19. comment
  20. comment
    Comment #48933966

    So you’re saying there’s no data to group these settings by editions.

  21. comment
    Comment #48929383

    Ditto with this, if arxiv is just a hosting site then what’s different then a personal GitHub site hosting your paper? Ai and Google would pick it up eventually.

  22. comment
    Comment #48929374

    I’d say these are reasonable settings for most uses. Though do you know of surveys that back this up? I don’t mean to nit pick too much, I’d just like to see common uses and the da…

  23. comment
    Comment #48896173

    Hmm, I am surprised to hear it’s understood to be exponential, but thanks for the reference. I will read up on it.

  24. comment
    Comment #48895946

    “And here we found the culprit. The paper I was submitting belongs under cs.CY, Computers and Society, as I now know after reviewing all the categories more carefully.” I’d think t…

  25. comment
    Comment #48895824

    With the rise of ai, ai-based papers, and ais writing terrible papers; why are you surprised or frustrated? Wouldn’t you want some kind of barrier against slop?