Viewing profile — dmilicev2

I believe so, sounds logical, yes. I haven’t measured it across LLMs to tell you if there is more/less overhead, confusion, hallucinations, repeated mistakes etc..

I feel like there should be a consistent protocol, an industry standard for interacting with AIs, I do see value in it, however, as you said, it doesn’t seem like there’s value in …

foo, bar?

Thank you Mahjabinbm, looking forward to it.

Yes. It's a continuous and steady flow of dopamine until you run out of tokens.

I experienced this friction. Maintenance of memory across projects, across different LLMs, is a recipe for frustration and disaster. This MCP tool I made might help elicit desired …

Yes, and that's one of the reasons I started working on this tool: to elicit desirable behavior from AIs before turn 1. AI is still non-deterministic and won't follow instructions …

I'm not sure what the best course of action is here, but I fail to see the benefits to society if we were to set up legal entities for each AI agent at this stage. I think the resp…

Me neither. If true artificial sentience is achieved, what does that say about us?

AI is not sentient, therefore not liable for its actions. It would be pointless. We ought to look one step beyond the lines of code for liability. Unless the AI eventually passes t…

In an attempt to reduce cold starts in AI sessions Ive made a tool that runs as an MCP server and loads the context before Turn 0. Two things happen: Personal Priors - your workflo…