Viewing profile — dkechag
dkechag
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Apr 06, 2022, 9:22 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 177
- Public activity
- 40 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About dkechag
Astro blog:
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47330184
The primes one is my least favourite one indeed, I left it in just because I happened to include it in the very first version and I am thinking it just counts for 5% in the end... …
-
comment
Comment #47300889
It came up recently in a post I did about how bad Geekbench 6 multi-core is, and some are saying they still use it for single-thread as it correlates well with SPEC. I thought I'd …
- story
-
comment
Comment #47300207
It came up recently in a post I did about how bad Geekbench 6 multi-core is, and some are saying they still use it for single-thread as it correlates well with SPEC. I thought I'd …
- story
-
comment
Comment #47298758
They warn they will reclaim. I had two accounts, one processing data for a free weather service I volunteer for, so it's not idle and has had no issues for a couple of years now. T…
-
comment
Comment #47298727
I had a bit of a hard time when I first signed up. It turns out the problem was I had included "oracle" in my email (I give a different email on my domain to every provider), so so…
-
comment
Comment #47298706
I meant pretty much anything Oracle... except their free/cheap VMs :)
-
comment
Comment #47298398
The testing was from mid-September to mid-January, Turin was released on Azure end of January. They simply did not make the cut, unfortunately I could not wait forever for them, th…
-
comment
Comment #47296273
Huh, I have not been able to provision any newer CPUs after dozens of tests, certainly not Emerald Rapids. And that blog post is weird, their charts don't even have a key shown, it…
-
comment
Comment #47296218
May I suggest the one I use (I wrote it), which also correlates well with SPEC & Geekbench 5, but also runs the benchmarks on all cores if you want to so you get both max single-th…
-
comment
Comment #47293786
Yeah, that's the main reason. Not sure why the ban, medium etc are much worse... The second reason is I've never had a slashdot submission accepted and I saw that after posting thi…
-
comment
Comment #47293736
There's a table of contents near the top. Use it to jump to the performance per dollar.
-
comment
Comment #47293668
A 16-core 4565p is of course faster in max single thread speed than a 96-core that GCP is running at an economically optimal base clock. A year ago I gave a talk about optimizing C…
-
comment
Comment #47293598
> No theory. No fluff. Just production. ChatGPT tells me "no theory, no fluff" all the time :D
-
comment
Comment #47293592
Going to the cloud can't possibly be as cheap as owning your own hardware for obvious reasons - they have to make money somehow. Well, unless you use spot instances, which uses spa…
-
comment
Comment #47293571
I wrote the article. I would NEVER tell anyone to use Oracle, as the vendor lock in and strong-arming and pricing is ridiculous. That said, I am hosting small projects on Oracle Cl…
-
comment
Comment #47293322
From your post I can tell you did not read the "year-old blog post". It starts with the scaling, but goes further and explains a lot. I am a software engineer specializing in algor…
- story
-
comment
Comment #47293058
Not sure you opened the blog post. The scaling is atrocious, even for tasks that should be extremely parallelizable. The Geekbench "Text Processing" benchmark supposedly processes …
-
story
Does Apple‘s M5 Max Really “Destroy” a 96-Core Threadripper?
https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/apples-18-co...
-
comment
Comment #44354193
Yeah, I also get confused with references. I was annoyed from the start, when "Mojo" was announced as a Python family language. Mojolicious uses the "Mojo" namespace and is referre…
- story
- story
- story