Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — djcapelis

djcapelis

HN member
Joined
Thu, Oct 01, 2009, 6:32 AM UTC
HN karma
4,479
Public activity
1,028 items

About djcapelis

My website is http://capelis.dj. You can email me via mail@ the same domain as my website.

I used to work on making the robots that carry hundreds of humans around inside them safer. Which is another way of saying I worked on trains. Now I work elsewhere.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #46976993

    > In what world is public opinion not universally against the cartels? It's hard to take you seriously after that. I think you’re getting tripped up by some specific wording and ma…

  2. comment
    Comment #46407883

    > Anthropic makes some good stuff, so I'm confused why they even bother entertaining foregone conclusions. I think it’s just because there’s enough people working there that figure…

  3. comment
    Comment #45495533

    Tariffs in a rapidly growing and innovative industry always makes the country with lots of protectionism end up with less competitive products because they’ve removed the competiti…

  4. comment
    Comment #45468643

    You’ve made the same mistake the poster you’re replying to pointed out. Women in lesbian relationships have a high rate of having experienced domestic violence in their lives, and …

  5. comment
    Comment #44820005

    Most proposals for 9 bit bytes weren't for adopting 8 bits of data in a byte, they were to have 8 bits for data and 1 bit for something else, typically either error detection or di…

  6. comment
    Comment #44018006

    Yes. It’s a transfer if it’s the same train station. If it isn’t, it isn’t. :)

  7. comment
    Comment #44017165

    This article is not quite accurate like some of the others that have excitedly reported on this stretch a bit before it’s true. You cannot yet travel this all the way by passenger …

  8. comment
    Comment #42772778

    It’s a restriction either way. Whether it’s a reasonable one or one that meets elevated scrutiny is a separate second question. Your points are arguing that question and are reason…

  9. comment
    Comment #42772760

    It’s not meant to say they’re the same thing, it’s meant to demonstrate clearly that venue restrictions even when content neutral can impose restrictions on speech and those restri…

  10. comment
    Comment #42763917

    I’m not, for what it’s worth. I’m arguing that I think the free speech case is stronger for the users and software distributors who are enjoined from the platform or distributing c…

  11. comment
    Comment #42763871

    Yes, most of the court felt intermediate scrutiny was the appropriate standard in part because of the reasons you outlined. (I also agree that this is a different case, I only poin…

  12. comment
    Comment #42763820

    Look, my point is that the first amendment is in play here and it’s not ridiculous to suggest a free speech analysis is required to hold the law as constitutional or not, which is …

  13. comment
    Comment #42761693

    The first amendment enjoins the government from actions. Private companies are welcome to ban or regulate their own venues as they see fit.

  14. comment
    Comment #42761626

    Graffiti laws are also evaluated under heightened scrutiny due to free speech implications. A law having an impact on free speech does not mean it never holds, but it must be analy…

  15. comment
    Comment #42761614

    Did you read the opinion? It did its analysis as requiring some level of scrutiny because of the free speech implications under intermediate (and in Sofomayor’s concurrence strict)…

  16. comment
    Comment #42761590

    The justices on the Supreme Court analyzed the constitutionality of this law under a free speech basis. The Per Curiam opinion of the court suggested the correct standard was inter…

  17. comment
    Comment #42761148

    Whether you think it’s ridiculous or not, restrictions on distribution of software being a violation of US free speech rights has been an established part of US case law for around…

  18. comment
    Comment #42760963

    I think that’s a huge difference, yes. And about what apps my phone is able to download, and what servers it is able to access. Another huge difference is broadcasting is about usa…

  19. comment
    Comment #42760063

    I’m not arguing it’s a restriction on TikTok’s speech or bytedance’s speech. It’s a restriction on my speech. Telling me where I can publish a video? Telling me what apps I can dow…

  20. comment
    Comment #38066001

    If a "moral stance" is one you only hold when it applies to other people's decisions, it's illegitimate and those stances have a name we give them: hypocrisy. Also. Comparing suppo…

  21. comment
  22. comment
    Comment #37159056

    It’s simple: don’t hire devs by the army.

  23. comment
    Comment #37017688

    They’re not options, they’re grants of stock units which vest over time. A unit of stock is a share granted and vesting at its full price, not an option to buy stock at some price …

  24. comment
    Comment #36917374

    Sigh. Though there are definitely automated track laying machines in the US, some pieces might not meet the needs of the project and may want other machines. You can of course ship…

  25. comment
    Comment #36917345

    This is what zero miles of track looked like in 2022: https://youtu.be/gAZqaESaZLg This is what zero miles of track looks like a year later: https://youtu.be/luX35wVJt84 You can to…