Viewing profile — distant-uncle
distant-uncle
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Oct 17, 2012, 12:34 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 8
- Public activity
- 12 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About distant-uncle
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #6292566
It seems to me that when you say that people have a natural right to profit, you actually mean a "right to exclude". I think that's a whole nuther kettle of fish. For one, the two …
-
comment
Comment #6154687
> Trespass is about land Well, to borrow a phrase, it really isn't. Or more precisely, land is one subject area. Take a few moments to research if you're curious, but do go beyond …
-
comment
Comment #6154503
Infringement is not theft, it is an entirely separate legal concept. Dowling v. United States http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100913/22513210998.shtml The above deals specifical…
-
comment
Comment #6153682
I've been mulling over the most common argument predictably wheeled out by the patent aggressors and their supporters: "Theft! We don't want them to steal our stuff!!" Never mind t…
-
comment
Comment #6153530
> Using standards-essential patents as legal weapons is completely unethical. I would argue, it's more like: "using patents as weapons is completely unethical." And yes, it's a sha…
-
comment
Comment #4815343
It's only an offensive move if you consider battle 'N + 1 == N'. Google didn't start this war.
-
comment
Comment #4812194
Very true. Or even just: "A combination of chemicals". What I also find remarkable is how much actual research in biotech is done with public money. And how much big pharma spends …
-
comment
Comment #4812115
> when they get to such a size where keeping the status quo would help them more than reforming patent law would that they'd drop their ideology and start throwing patent suits aro…
-
comment
Comment #4795086
In a system without patents, collusion would be checked by increased competition. As it is, FRAND patents are irrelevant, because as it has been already shown, some companies fail …
-
comment
Comment #4794145
If anything makes the case for the complete abolition of the patent system, then the so called FRAND patents are it. It's interesting to see how the notion is completely lost on so…
-
comment
Comment #4664351
Lol that would be highly unethical. More seriously though, names are not people. Corporations are people, my friend. Oh and lastly, I do tend to think that on the basis of defamati…
-
comment
Comment #4662701
At least in the case of trademarks, the potential for defamation gives it some credibility. I suppose from the standpoint of brand confusion alone, trademarks and patents are both …