Viewing profile — disruptek
disruptek
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jun 28, 2019, 6:05 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 24
- Public activity
- 12 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About disruptek
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48959161
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #39372706
Resubmit because I typo'd the link. XD
- story
-
comment
Comment #39372673
This'll get you closer: https://github.com/nim-works/cps Sorry, I was in a hurry.
-
comment
Comment #39372598
Another in the continuing discussion... CPS as a library using nothing more than Nim's meta-programming.
- story
-
comment
Comment #25350246
You can read about the reasoning behind subgraph ownership here: https://github.com/nim-lang/RFCs/issues/244
-
comment
Comment #25347942
Also, we don't scan "live" memory, which matches your intuition -- why would we?
-
comment
Comment #24805364
Nim doesn't require that you use a gc; one of its many gc options is `none`, which is, as it sounds, no garbage collector at all.
-
comment
Comment #24789108
I want to remove a couple misunderstandings that I see in the comments. Nim is "not done" and I hope it never will be. Watch Guy Steele's "Growing a Language" talk for my rationale…
-
comment
Comment #24187501
Please open an issue if you want to change the semantics; it's trivial to use the hash instead.
-
comment
Comment #24180774
Nimph has had lockfiles for months. https://github.com/disruptek/nimph