Viewing profile — didjathinkmess
didjathinkmess
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jul 13, 2021, 5:48 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 55
- Public activity
- 47 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About didjathinkmess
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #29599372
I hear Myocarditis is absolutely huge in the 4 and under age group! Just trying to get out in front of this.
-
comment
Comment #29599088
Natural immunity followed by a single dose is the strongest immunity available supposedly. Many of us likely have cross reactive immunity from a previous Coronavirus infection from…
-
comment
Comment #29599030
>So, yes, vaccination may not prevent being infected, but for sure it helps immensely in avoiding being hospitalized and shortening the infection, which does actually translate in …
-
comment
Comment #29536339
Wait, how are totalitarian governments going to subjugate their populations in the near future if the illness resulting from Omicron is merely mild? Kidding, they'll just do it any…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #29347435
Good comment, also: the vaccinated are a fertile ground for mutations that eventually evade the vaccine. Unless you have a study that backs up the claim that this mutation phenomen…
-
comment
Comment #29089642
You're comparing mRNA vaccines to traditional vaccines. Unlikely outcome sure. So is getting autism from a traditional vaccine but the warning still appears on the MMR vaccine inse…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #29077442
>Vaccines rapidly lose efficacy when the virus they target has free real estate (vectors) in which to mutate. The finger pointing game really has to stop considering anyone vaccina…
-
comment
Comment #29077355
I believe the word slip is 100% intentional. It's the same kind of people that conflate, on purpose, "the vaccines are 95% effective!" with the wishful notion that they stop the sp…
-
comment
Comment #29077021
The author refers to getting innoculated as "immunized" which is about as scientific as flat earth. The rest of the article isn't much better. If everyone was actually immunized, w…
-
comment
Comment #28990125
I haven't heard of a shorter duration with vaccination. Could you please post the source for this?
-
comment
Comment #28982682
He's talking about transmission, you are talking about reduction of symptoms. The vaccines don't prevent transmission. Now follow that to its logical conclusion: "we forcefully vac…
-
comment
Comment #28982530
Interesting how this peer review argument comes out selectively and not when something like Surgisphere happens and their bogus findings are immediately passed off as the ultimate …
-
comment
Comment #28979729
That's up to the reader to judge. I always advise doing your own research. For example look at the history of the Atlantic, which political side do they align with, have they ever …
-
comment
Comment #28979684
Okay cool, pretend the page's only purpose is a collection of links to medical studies. Find anything amiss with any of actual 64 studies? Or are you content to just not move past …
-
comment
Comment #28979276
Why take the biased article at its word? Luckily we have access to all of these studies and can do the research ourselves (thanks Internet!) https://ivmmeta.com/ The current count …
-
comment
Comment #28979229
You heard it hear first: Ivermectin people have been pushing snake oil (nothing specific, just general snake oil.. like Ivermectin!) for 1000 years. Should I ask him for a source?
-
comment
Comment #28979174
Took a look through through that Intercept article. It reads like any of the biased opinion based drivel passing for journalism these days. Trying to conflate politics with medicin…
-
comment
Comment #28598722
Trick question, they're both censorship.
-
comment
Comment #28598565
Just because I don't agree with Nazis who want to take my guns away, doesn't mean I want to censor them. It's much more useful to engage with them and get into an open discussion. …
-
comment
Comment #28434959
Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater. It's a meta analysis of 25 different studies and some will have flaws of course. For me, if one single study showed positive result…
-
comment
Comment #28399498
Please circle back and post that article. That would be the first that I've heard of any difference in time between the two. Honestly it sounds suspicious.
-
comment
Comment #28399477
Less likely to be sick and.. That's it. Equally as likely to spread the Delta variant if we're considering viral load as the metric. That's only compared to an unvaccinated person …
-
comment
Comment #28376195
Um yeah, what's the virus going to do, die off? Of course not, it's going to mutate and continue to survive in as many hosts as possible. A mutation that's more easily transmitted …