Viewing profile — dhhwrongagain
dhhwrongagain
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Feb 27, 2020, 1:26 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 61
- Public activity
- 29 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About dhhwrongagain
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #23334214
What a mess. We should just return to catholic monarchy or at very least restrict voting to a trusted nobility. Democracy is really just a euphemism for rule by the media, and the …
-
comment
Comment #23287726
What does the pizza emoji at the end of the article mean?
- story
-
comment
Comment #23162636
No, he explicitly states that women roughly have same average iq as men and are equally competent and capable to do engineering work. OTOH personality traits aren’t distributed equ…
-
comment
Comment #23124224
Damore never claimed women were intrinsically less inclined to engineering. He cited the big five personality trait model as evidence for why engineering culture is not welcoming t…
- story
-
comment
Comment #22936264
You have to keep saying it because you haven’t explained why referencing suckless has any bearing on whether the project will support CJK. In particular you have no basis for this …
-
comment
Comment #22935523
Are you serious? Of course the question comes with the reasonable assumption that the proper declaration has been made especially since it’s a well known standard function. Additio…
-
comment
Comment #22935472
It was baseless. You had no evidence CJK will not be supported. It was just a baseless condemnation of the project because the readme referenced suckless.
-
comment
Comment #22876574
> The underlying intent may well be that, but it is couched in both ignorance and callous disregard for others. Nope, that’s just your projection. You’re callously disregarding him…
-
comment
Comment #22876173
Good faith is just as much about assuming good intent as it is about assuming genuineness. All of those statements are a far cry from “fuck everyone else.” The underlying intent co…
-
comment
Comment #22876075
There actually was a point. His point is that, while it might seem counterintuitive, allowing suppliers to price with demand may improve the situation for the majority of people, e…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #22875893
Sounds like you’re just having an emotional reaction instead of engaging his point in good faith. If you’re so empathetic, maybe you should remember that the person who made that p…
-
comment
Comment #22875865
I agree but he said the types needed to be corrected. As far as I know the types were already correct.
-
comment
Comment #22875854
The parent was definitely talking about the applicability of using assembly in the context of this project. Vectorization is irrelevant here.
-
comment
Comment #22875827
What observable difference is there between malloc(0) and malloc((size_t)0)?
-
comment
Comment #22875799
Program bloat is not due to poor compiler optimization. It’s due to runtime size and a lack of effort to make runtimes smaller. In particular the c runtime.
-
comment
Comment #22875776
False or vacuously true
-
comment
Comment #22875763
All of the performance wins you’re referencing come from vectorization, you typically can’t vectorize OS code since it isn’t ALU bound, which makes your point moot.
-
comment
Comment #22870548
Is memset(malloc(0), 0, 0) undefined behavior?
-
comment
Comment #22721701
That’s not true. Many people write code on Mac despite kernel extensions being disabled and SIP. What will be considered root will be a superficial emulation convincing enough to f…
-
comment
Comment #22721688
Get ready to not have root access on your laptop. The writing is on the wall: * signed software restrictions * no kernel extensions * SIP Dropping x86 compatibility will be the las…
-
comment
Comment #22701133
Yeah that’s a very good point. There may be multiple reasons but a performance reason of which I’m aware is downward stacks are more efficient for allocating aligned memory: sp = (…
-
comment
Comment #22567942
It’s sad to live in a world where people are naive enough to assume that doing the right thing without incentive is commonplace. You must be great to negotiate with.