Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — dextercd

dextercd

HN member
Joined
Sun, Jan 26, 2020, 9:48 PM UTC
HN karma
190
Public activity
49 items

About dextercd

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48652336

    This comment on the 7th of May from someone at Let's Encrypt says that implementation may be delayed until Q3 due to open issues in the specification. That might be what happened. …

  2. comment
    Comment #48125806

    Apparently VeriSign plans to discontinue .name: https://itp.cdn.icann.org/en/files/consensus-policies/rsep-2...

  3. comment
    Comment #47067745

    Your comment is 100% correct, but I just want to point out that this doesn't negate the risks of bob's approach here. LE wouldn't see this as a legitimate reason to raise rate limi…

  4. comment
    Comment #47066426

    An account needs to be created before you can request a certificate. Some ACME clients might create the account for you implicitly when you request the first certificate, but in th…

  5. comment
    Comment #47065763

    This adds a new validation method that people can use if they want. The existing validation methods ( https://letsencrypt.org/docs/challenge-types/ ) aren't going away, so your cur…

  6. comment
    Comment #46685865

    The server that wants to authenticate clients via mTLS doesn't need the clientAuth EKU on its certificate, only the clients do. Most of the time you set up mTLS by creating your ow…

  7. comment
    Comment #46654775

    Thanks for chiming in! I remember now that you also said this on the LE community forum. Right, that explains it. So the use would be for things other than websites or for websites…

  8. comment
    Comment #46654381

    All major root store programs (Chrome, Apple, Microsoft, Mozilla) have this power. They set the requirements that CAs must follow to be included in their root store, and for most C…

  9. comment
    Comment #46650240

    It's a requirement from the Chrome root program. This page is probably the best resource on why they want this: https://googlechrome.github.io/chromerootprogram/moving-forw...

  10. comment
    Comment #46479026

    Interesting! On the Google search results page at the bottom there's a city name + "From your IP address" link. Clicking it shows a map with a circled region. It seems to match wit…

  11. comment
    Comment #46477819

    2.33 km off for me. Pretty cool

  12. comment
    Comment #46406879

    You need external monitoring of certificate validity. Your ACME client might not be sending failure notifications properly (like happened to Bazel here). The client could also thin…

  13. comment
    Comment #45319196

    Here's the Python version I've been using: https://gist.github.com/dextercd/3bd65c1e32635b9e7bebf287b52... Another issue I just ran into is that a colon separated value for ExecSea…

  14. comment
    Comment #45314679

    You can use systemd-run with --shell (or a subset of options enabled by --shell) and -p to specify service properties to run commands interactively in a similar environment as your…

  15. comment
    Comment #45157300

    A code signing certificate does not cost $500 a year. The OP links to an offering by Certum which is just $25 a year plus the cost for a reusable smart card. Personally, I recently…

  16. comment
    Comment #43711702

    CT definitely helps, but not everyone monitors it. This is an area where I still need to improve. But even if you detect a misissued cert, it can not reliably be revoked with OCSP/…

  17. comment
    Comment #43711247

    Sure, but it's even better if everyone else does too, including attackers that mislead CAs into misissuing a cert. CAs used to be able to use WHOIS for DCV. The fact that this opti…

  18. comment
    Comment #43711204

    Apple introduced this proposal. Why would they care about a CA's legal exposure? Lower the lifetime of certs does mean that orgs will be better prepared to replace bad certs when t…

  19. comment
    Comment #43699233

    Stealing a private key or getting a CA to misissue a certificate is hard. Then actually making use of this in a MITM attack is also difficult. Still, oppressive states or hacked IS…

  20. comment
    Comment #43697795

    No idea how many are first-party or vetted by Microsoft. Probably none of them. But I really, really doubt you can only run software that ticks one of those two boxes. Certify The …

  21. comment
    Comment #43696233

    I learned a lot from TLS Mastery by Michael W. Lucas.

  22. comment
    Comment #43696018

    Let's Encrypt lists 10 ACME clients for Windows / IIS. If an organisation ignores all those options, then I suppose they should keep doing it manually. But at the end of the day, t…

  23. comment
    Comment #43695639

    If a CA or subscriber improves their security but had an undetected incident in the past, a hacker today has a 397 day cert and can reuse the domain control validation in the next …

  24. comment
    Comment #43694712

    I think most orgs can get away with free ACME clients and free/cheap monitoring options. This will be painful for people in the short term, but in the long term I believe it will m…

  25. comment
    Comment #43694525

    "outdated certificate data" would be domains you no longer control. (Example would be a customer no longer points a DNS record at some service provider or domains that have changed…