Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — detst

detst

HN member
Joined
Wed, Feb 03, 2010, 6:43 AM UTC
HN karma
1,284
Public activity
485 items

About detst

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #6686644

    > Whatever floats your pompous self-righteous boat. > I may be curt, strident, and critical, but you don't really have high ground when it comes to condescension. You went straight…

  2. comment
    Comment #6684308

    > Some substantial portion of AngularJS devs are unhappy. Define "substantial". I've seen some complaints here that AngularDart has, and will, take away from AngularJS, which, agai…

  3. comment
    Comment #6681017

    You claimed that Dart is a flawed language. Substantiate that claim. Basic stuff here. If you can't, I must assume you're a troll or have no clue yet somehow think you do. > Do you…

  4. comment
    Comment #6679682

    > reasoning behind it In all of your condescending[1] comments, you have forgotten to actually articulate what your reasoning is. These are as close as you got: Dart doesn't have t…

  5. comment
    Comment #6679183

    What exactly are those instructions? You or your friend have a misunderstanding. This dual-implementation will benefit the project as a whole (whether you prefer JS or Dart). That'…

  6. comment
    Comment #6678736

    > it was fairly obvious that some of the guys didn't want Dart in there I don't think it was obvious. It may be true but they were uncontroversial comments on a controversial topic…

  7. comment
    Comment #6677978

    Certainly possible but remember that "contractor" and "employee" have legal definitions. You can't "just" call an employee (by the legal definition) a contractor. (Edit: I see ljos…

  8. comment
    Comment #6674274

    They have deprecation policies in at least some cases. They may not be unconditional guarantees but they're still just risk factors to be evaluated individually. I have no problem …

  9. comment
    Comment #6673944

    > Since this service is paid, I could be netting a lot of money through it, only for it to fizzle out. But that's true of any service from any company. If I'm a stay-at-home mom ma…

  10. comment
    Comment #6673768

    > I wonder if enough people avoid new Google products due to shutdown fears [...] I doubt it. That attitude is mostly a HN/geek thing. I like that they're willing to try things and…

  11. comment
  12. comment
    Comment #6626356

    The Stripe API[1] does this (i.e., "expanding objects"). [1] https://stripe.com/docs/api

  13. comment
  14. comment
    Comment #6394725

    > When the boss disrespects customers in front of his team, that sets the upper limit for how well customers will be treated by the company. A single incident sets the upper limit?…

  15. comment
    Comment #6103167

    > I've seen this happen to a few of my friends who hit it big [...] it's like the insatiable drive to achieve that made that possible just evaporates. This hits many people after j…

  16. comment
    Comment #5882009

    It's not as if the president is an uninterested party. He very much supports the NSA, is in a position of power on the matter and if he's got nothing to hide then he has nothing to…

  17. comment
    Comment #5852135

    No, I'm not. I'm sure you can do your own search for "law", "tax", "immigration", etc. If you had done that, I'd have no issue with a civil critique of the content but to dismiss (…

  18. comment
    Comment #5850179

    Those things are covered and if you would have taken the time to do even a cursory review before writing your baseless dismissal you would have seen this. It's clear this is an evo…

  19. comment
    Comment #5787566

    > while pretending to apologize No it was genuine. I don't think you lied at all and I apologized for it. > but are tying to suggest that I'm a liar anyway with the ambiguous phras…

  20. comment
    Comment #5787412

    > That's dishonest. You know quite well that, above, I was referring to the actress interviewed in the article under discussion, and, below, to Kardashian I'm sorry. I honestly mis…

  21. comment
    Comment #5787188

    I'm not freeunter and it's not important to me but it is obnoxious; that being someone going out of their way to make themselves seem above something or someone else when no one as…

  22. comment
    Comment #5737316

    > For the time being, yes, it is. It's a hypothetical not a question of the present state of things but either way, I disagree. Rachel's comment [1] (I understand it wasn't present…

  23. comment
    Comment #5737002

    I'll concede that this wasn't the best place to make the point (I'll make it again, along with others, including PG). Perhaps I did look at spiff's comment in a vacuum and took adv…

  24. comment
    Comment #5736853

    [Meta-comment warning] This comment is in the same category as the one PG talks about here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4693920 I don't want to pick on you because there m…

  25. comment