Viewing profile — deryilz
deryilz
HN member- Joined
- Sun, May 04, 2025, 9:58 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 435
- Public activity
- 24 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About deryilz
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46842356
The Swift Book is good for this: https://docs.swift.org/swift-book/documentation/the-swift-pr...
-
comment
Comment #46380058
If you're going to put it in a bag for a week, why not use some kind of hibernation feature?
- comment
-
comment
Comment #46097797
As another commenter said, sometimes upgrades require manual intervention. You can fix this using a tool like informant which shows you all the interventions you have to do before …
-
comment
Comment #44550361
No adblocking extension would ever rely on a clear bug to function. Google reviews extension code and would immediately patch the bug, and maybe use it as an excuse to kick the ext…
-
comment
Comment #44547755
Dude, what.
-
comment
Comment #44547728
Also, dude, from your other comments: "What a selfish dickhead, helping them make better nooses to put around everyone's necks (including his own)." And "People like this are enemi…
-
comment
Comment #44547625
Hi, I appreciate your opinion, but really disagree. First of all, this is one bug, and most of the ones I find don't "act against user's interests" (not that this one could have be…
-
comment
Comment #44546898
I think the trouble is that certain adblocking features (like skipping ads on YouTube, Twitch, etc) require modifying the page you're viewing in your browser; just filtering networ…
-
comment
Comment #44546483
Yeah, this was my thought process. I get the appeal, but I don't think a million-user open-source extension is gonna start relying on a clear bug to function.
-
comment
Comment #44546440
Unfortunately extensions can't have webview perms :(
-
comment
Comment #44545693
From my experience (as a Brave user), using a User-Agent switching extension and setting it to Firefox for twitch.tv gets around that :)
-
comment
Comment #44545582
I agree that would change things but I can't picture an open-source extension with millions of users pivoting to rely on something that's clearly a bug.
-
comment
Comment #44545566
Author here, thank you! A lot of the comments here are more general arguments about MV3 and Google (which I kinda expected) but I'm glad see someone who liked my post :)
-
comment
Comment #44545537
Author here, sorry. I don't think any open-source extension (especially large adblockers with millions of users) could actually get away with using this bug, because Google is payi…
-
comment
Comment #44544842
Sometimes you get $0, sometimes you get more. I would like to mention this stuff on my college applications, and even if I tried to gatekeep it, it'd eventually be patched. Not sur…
- story
-
comment
Comment #44534704
I'm quite liking the syntax, especially the !> operator.
-
comment
Comment #44416284
It's always great to see interactive posts. I also appreciated the list of where Bloom filters were used in popular programs.
-
comment
Comment #44116790
True, but I don't think K12 students are the main targets of these big gray-hat companies that buy bugs for a lot of money.
-
comment
Comment #44114776
Keep in mind it's a ChromeOS only bug. They regularly get less money, because not that many people use ChromeOS.
- story
-
comment
Comment #44101526
[flagged]
- story