Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — derdi

derdi

HN member
Joined
Tue, Jul 16, 2024, 1:06 PM UTC
HN karma
392
Public activity
239 items

About derdi

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
  2. comment
    Comment #49244813

    Got it, thank you! I had read your "remove any occurrence of the expression type in the tree-walking AST" as removing nodes from the AST, but in some sense it's about removing edge…

  3. comment
    Comment #49244220

    Fair! Though I still don't know what you mean by "removing" nodes from the tree-walking interpreter's AST. Assume we have an AST like: (Add (LoadConst 1) (LoadVar x)) The correspon…

  4. comment
    Comment #49243867

    I was wondering what this was in reference to; it's not in reference to TFA here. It's a quote from https://bytecode.news/posts/2026/08/because-it-s-not-fun-eno... , so presumably …

  5. comment
    Comment #49243839

    Hmm, what's a stack machine AST? I can't follow your description of the transform, what does "remove" mean here? I can remove all of the internal nodes of a tree, which leaves me w…

  6. comment
    Comment #49243739

    Given that GCC was first released in 1987, that would mean that tail call optimization, including of indirect calls, has been around for more than half of GCC's lifetime. So it's i…

  7. comment
    Comment #49232835

    I flagged this. I don't think we need to doxx people here, it's enough that the featured article does so.

  8. comment
    Comment #49232452

    "AI-generated copy that says a lot and commits to nothing." Haha. Seriously, it's nice that Kimi did the investigation, and it's good that that's disclosed at the end (would be bet…

  9. comment
    Comment #49232145

    Haha, excellent downvote, thanks. I stand corrected, one other person mentioned the word "copyright" in the time between me searching the discussion for that term, and then writing…

  10. comment
    Comment #49231881

    Nobody mentioned copyrights or stealing in this thread.

  11. comment
    Comment #49229830

    Nice, but what is the motivation for this? That the syntax is perceived to be nicer than SMT-LIB format? Or that Lean can get involved? Differential testing? Just for fun?

  12. comment
    Comment #49229625

    The Turing test has been passed. The Turing test had already been passed in 2002. The Turing test isn't about some machine fooling all humans all the time. It's about fooling some …

  13. comment
    Comment #49229558

    What should one check for?

  14. comment
    Comment #49216249

    Not sure what this is a parody of, but it's hilarious, thank you. Keep it up!

  15. comment
    Comment #49215809

    What do you mean, "No"? Letting an LLM loose on Postgres is exactly what happened here: https://malisper.me/pgrust-rebuilding-postgres-in-rust-with-...

  16. comment
    Comment #49214660

    The "blocking" happens on the side of the AI users. You like using AI. You are aware of this policy. Will you submit an AI-generated pull request to OpenJDK? No? Voilà, you have su…

  17. comment
  18. comment
    Comment #49210950

    Why would they? The only thing the readme says about RESEARCH.md is "if you want to contribute to the language please read RESEARCH.md". The OP doesn't want to contribute, they wan…

  19. comment
    Comment #49209211

    You're presumably using an LLM to drive the compiler, and your LLM should be just as capable of reading the compiler's error message and fixing the problem. So why double the work?…

  20. comment
    Comment #49209129

    It's not, and the article's attempt at putting lipstick on this pig is nonsensical: > StringView has no operator bool, so a successful match reads as !scanner.accept('=').isEmpty()…

  21. comment
    Comment #49196940

    Got it, fair enough, thanks!

  22. comment
    Comment #49196039

    Cute game! Very CPU-hungry (in Firefox on Linux), maybe you can get it a bit more optimized. There are some annoying AI-isms ("the X is the goal not the Y"-- just tell me the X ple…

  23. comment
    Comment #49184657

    > Before, coding is only 14% therefore, small slice. But also, no, because they write: > “coding” (not including bug fixing, testing, etc.) What if bug fixing includes "coding", or…

  24. comment
    Comment #49172741

    What kind of robots are we talking about? What will robots do for me five years from today?

  25. comment
    Comment #49155394

    There was this submission two months ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48365904 . Basically they have a TUI frontend for the same thing. And the blog post says: "Bonsai_ter…