Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — dependenttypes

dependenttypes

HN member
Joined
Tue, Jan 01, 2019, 7:39 PM UTC
HN karma
1,649
Public activity
1,251 items

About dependenttypes

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #24495510

    > They're a charity and a private institution, not a legal arm of the UK Just like the Internet Watch Foundation. Being a private charity does not mean much for the UK.

  2. comment
    Comment #24495470

    It would be probably be more respectful if you would not mess with my posts, now even I do not know who made said comment. Guess I should start signing my posts and keep backups of…

  3. comment
    Comment #24495335

    > why are people trusting random IRC server admins e2ee means that you do not have to trust anyone > if it's public: who cares IRC also lacks end to end authentication, the server …

  4. comment
    Comment #24495321

    What kind of attitude do you think would make Linux on desktop mainstream?

  5. comment
    Comment #24492817

    Is the passport number supposed to be secret? You show them when you buy alcohol in some countries as well to the police if they ask for it - all of these people can copy the numbe…

  6. comment
    Comment #24492790

    There are private IRC channels (password protected or invite-only) as well as private messages.

  7. comment
    Comment #24492768

    If she could not do the job then she should have resigned. Edit: there was another post by [redacted] but it disappeared, it does not even show as deleted, weird. It said: "This is…

  8. comment
    Comment #24492691

    IRC has the issue that it lacks end to end encryption (and sadly OTR is outdated garbage) If you use netcat you also do not use tls, try openssl s_client -connect server:port inste…

  9. comment
    Comment #24492583

    It certainly is free. The standards are generally backwards compatible and the changes are simple. You do not even need to be aware about the differences between C89 and C11 to con…

  10. comment
    Comment #24483498

    It seems somewhat common in cryptography.

  11. comment
    Comment #24483369

    I fail to see how focusing on the americas "it hurt democratic movements in third world countries". Are you saying that it would have been better if they never published anything? …

  12. comment
    Comment #24483230

    I do not understand. Why would him being pro-trump affect your sympathy regarding his prosecution due to revealing the Iraq war crimes? Surely it is possible to stand against unfai…

  13. comment
    Comment #24483098

    It certainly could. Countries do not have to abide by any laws, only the weak do. Sweden specifically is known to illegally extradite people. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repatria…

  14. comment
    Comment #24482888

    You are the only person in this discussion who mentioned the word conspiracy though.

  15. comment
    Comment #24479633

    How true is this? I was under the impression that all of the coronaviruses were published in a public repository even before the outbreak started.

  16. comment
    Comment #24479603

    In https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17938318 some of the parties involved mentioned that they disassociated from the paper in fear of being ostracized. Scientists are people to…

  17. comment
    Comment #24479509

    There is a wikipedia article about the 1st author https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li-Meng_Yan

  18. comment
    Comment #24478978

    > there are more women in high status (first or last) author positions in the open science community Is this true even when excluding fields and papers where names go in alphabetic…

  19. comment
    Comment #24478843

    Remember https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Most_Published_Research_Fi...

  20. comment
    Comment #24472981

    > and the control of the project is not given to the community. They also have private mailing lists, but I agree, it is certainly FOSS.

  21. story
  22. comment
    Comment #24471844

    If only it actually worked...

  23. comment
    Comment #24465391

    Yes, we know that.

  24. comment
    Comment #24464366

    Is it? I am pretty sure that v[x] where x >= n is UB.

  25. comment
    Comment #24460440

    I never understood why mozilla decided to implement their own inferior and laggier version of developer tools when firebug existed.