Viewing profile — deltasixeight
deltasixeight
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jul 30, 2021, 4:11 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 50
- Public activity
- 110 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About deltasixeight
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #29294654
Your computer. It hacks your computer to find out the state.
-
comment
Comment #29292660
http://www.ismycomputeron.com
-
comment
Comment #28843182
What laptop models were you guys using?
-
comment
Comment #28831414
Ease of reading is a practical feature not a beautiful one. If you think practicality is beautiful well great.
-
comment
Comment #28823110
Go is an ugly language. Practical but ugly.
-
comment
Comment #28819080
> A lot of odd Nix hate in here, or at least extreme dislike. I hate this expression. I'm a nix user. But if you can't understand why people dislike it... you're the one that's odd…
-
comment
Comment #28732083
Theoretically if the pesticide is below a certain threshold I should be fine. However if I mix thousands of dangerous chemicals together while keeping each portion below the danger…
-
comment
Comment #28677738
I read it. Science is not logic in the same way that a brick building is not a brick. Your description is inconsistent. You differentiate logical theories and scientific theories a…
-
comment
Comment #28673820
>Not going to address your weird attempt at wordplay There's absolutely zero need to be rude. There is no "wierd" word play here just misunderstandings and impoliteness by you. >Al…
-
comment
Comment #28666487
>This is factually false. Probability is embeddable into predicate logic, but predicate logic is not embeddable into (Bayesian) probability. This is actually an open problem (how t…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #28664505
Hard to say which came first. Probability can be defined in terms of axioms and classical logic just read any probability book. Classical logic can also be defined in terms of prob…
-
comment
Comment #28664065
No. You are both wrong. Logic is one of the fundamental axioms of the universe. We assume logic is true and consistently applies everywhere throughout the universe. This "rewriting…
-
comment
Comment #28588708
It's more than just a different way of thinking. There's an intuition gap caused by human bias. We bias towards one way of thinking and moving out of that bias is extremely hard.
-
comment
Comment #28581904
> A dedicated ticket-churner might be the most efficient way to churn tickets. But why are you so sure that the ticket stream amounts to the best long-term future for the software …
-
comment
Comment #28581867
Agreed. I'm not fetishizing scalability. I am saying that it is an inevitability. If you can avoid it great, but if you continue growing. You must face it.
-
comment
Comment #28578850
*would've agreed
-
comment
Comment #28578533
>Claiming that his approach was “not scalable” and that yours is “flexible” sounds naive and conceited to me. Insulting people for a differing opinion that is introduced neutrally …
-
comment
Comment #28578529
You're thinking along the lines of the dimension of distribution. Yes in terms of distribution, software scales because it can be copied. However there are many other dimensions of…
-
comment
Comment #28578470
Consider the fact that when complexity of the system rises to a point where no human can comprehend it, the project must lean more and more on specialization rather than a bunch of…
-
comment
Comment #28576972
This type of philosophy is good but not scalable or efficient. Scalability and efficiency requires well defined specialized roles. Additionally the more specialized and "stupid" ea…
-
comment
Comment #28521762
>This means, and I assume, we can also base all of our equations on say "energy is not conserved and always increase by 1 Joule", though the physics equations might be much more co…
-
comment
Comment #28521559
>Ah screw it I can’t finish this. I don’t know how to translate the steps without mutable state. I can either lose the ordering or I can say “then mix in the bananas,” thus modifyi…
-
comment
Comment #28507795
>Convention to me would mean something that has been accepted just because it’s always been done that way and people didn’t really bother to question why. You're wrong. The Thermod…
-
comment
Comment #28497539
Yeah you're right, but you do get my point. I should write, causation ALWAYS IMPLIES correlation.