Viewing profile — deltasevennine

>If you feel the need to for personal attacks over a philosophical debate, where you consistently insist of understanding the other side wrong, No personal attack was conducted her…

The point is to learn. You know I'm not trolling. What I said was true. You were going off on tangents. It's the only logical conclusion.

In your universe nobody wins. Nothing is true, nothing is false. Consider yourself the ultimate loser.

What's wrong with absolutist statements? Nothing. I made an absolutist statement which is definitely true. You failed to prove it wrong. Instead you had to do the pathetic move of …

I am from the camp that FP code produces much less tech debt then other forms of programming. But the problem here is that no one here can prove or disprove what I just said. And t…

>The problem with mapping paradigms to performance is that none of the paradigm purists care about performance, end of the day they care about theoretical purity. It's not theoreti…

>So you believe that the only way things can be compared is on quantitative measurements? Not with how they impress their users within whatever context they're in? No but I believe…

>No, that's not the definition³. It is, I just worded it differently. See the "cognitive biases" part on your citation. They use "reality" in place of what I mean by "unaware". If …

Yeah I get it. But What I'm saying is that there are many times when nobody can truly prove which whether they're in the cargo cult or the other people are in the cargo cult. So pr…

Nope. You aren't listening to me. I am getting exactly what he's saying. What I am saying is that the cargo culters could be right. You don't know. Nobody knows. Additionally he DI…

Sure. I simply use this "world" example because everyone here is in the same cult as me: "The world is round cult." When I use it, they get it. If I were speaking to a different cu…

>I do not see where he did that. He argued simply that context matters. (And yes a "bad" tool can be the right tool, if it is the only tool avaiable.) Well I see it. If you don't s…

>No, that's impossible. "Truly good" or "truly bad" are moral categories. Something closely related to religion, BTW… Wrong. Good and bad is used in a fuzzy way here, I'm OBVIOUSLY…

You did argue for everything is the same. Basically by "same" I mean everything is "equally good" depending on context. The whole hammers are for hammering and screwdrivers are for…

It is rude, but it is reasonable. When a child acts unruly and immature he must be disciplined with a forceful hand. I called you out harshly and the harshness was fucking deserved…

This is the problem. You didn't even read my argument. Go read it again, carefully, instead of skimming through it. My point is: Maybe one of these religions is right. Maybe someth…

This opinion is also biased. We have no theoretical method for determining which design philosophy is better than the other. We can't know whether the OOP religion is better, we al…

You seem to find lying "easy".

This speaks to your character. Not everyone finds lying easy regardless of whether it's allowed. Thank god I don't know you in rl.

Yeah you're probably right. Ill dive back into her book eventually. It's mostly the beginning chapters don't even get into the meat of CT quick enough. Instead it spends a lot of t…

Well if teaching length justified the title of Maxwell's equations I would agree with you. CT does take longer to learn. However if foundational theory was what justified the title…