Viewing profile — dehsge
dehsge
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Oct 04, 2025, 8:06 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 28
- Public activity
- 20 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About dehsge
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48969137
It’s not going to go back to pre LLM times, it’s also not going to go to a generative ai utopia where we can turn off our brains and a model will understand every nuance of human e…
-
comment
Comment #48883449
“It is the first step in sociological wisdom, to recognize that the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur:—like unto an…
-
comment
Comment #48397509
So that is kind of the point of studying maths right? Why something in unsolvable or undecidable can be as important as the output of a theorem. Questions like these, fields medal …
-
comment
Comment #48392955
For myself it was learning what a limit is in calculus, then learning about vector spaces, then learning about metric spaces and then learning about different topological spaces. T…
-
comment
Comment #48392789
unify general relativity with quantum mechanics. The continuum hypothesis. The traveling salesman problem in polynomial time.
-
comment
Comment #48224255
At the same time if you imagine a machine that can associate different maths. Would said machine encounter undecidable statements more frequently? Would the rules of said machine h…
-
comment
Comment #48215425
It’s not that. Consider the definition of the limit. The idea existed for a long time. Newton/Leibniz had the idea. That idea wasn’t formally defined until 134 years later with eps…
-
comment
Comment #48090587
Yeah that’s true, I didn’t go into detail here. I appreciate the clarification.
-
comment
Comment #48077715
If you are in the US. Proportionate representation stopped completely with the Reapportionment Act of 1929. Subsequently the tail end of the gilded age and enacted in June 18, only…
-
comment
Comment #47818583
There’s a bit of a double edged sword here. Removal of taxes leads to more coupled private/government relationships. Where external interests fund politicians to protect their own …
-
comment
Comment #47357060
Yeah that’s the trade off of this implementation. Lobste.rs already uses this implementation https://lobste.rs/about#invitations The comments are considerably better. I’m not even …
-
comment
Comment #47355284
Because you have an initial user who invited the bots. The whole invite tree of this user can cull all invites given by the user who added bots.
-
comment
Comment #47342055
Members only comment blogs. Where you need an invite to comment also solves the problem. You need to know a real human to get access.
-
comment
Comment #47042076
Compilers can never be error free for non trivial statements. This is outlined in Rices theorem. It’s one of the reasons we have observability/telemetry as well as tests.
-
comment
Comment #46760539
There are some numbers that are uncomputable in lean. You can do things to approximate them in lean however, those approximates may still be wrong. Leans uncomputable namespace is …
-
comment
Comment #46576732
Most math books do not provide solutions. Outside of calculus, advanced mathematics solutions are left as an exercise for the reader.
-
comment
Comment #46568643
There are other bounds here at play that are often not talked about. Ai runs on computers. Consider the undecidability of Rices theorem. Where compiled code of non trivial statemen…
-
comment
Comment #45932894
LLMs are bounded by the same bounds computers are. They run on computers so a prime example of a limitation is Rices theorem. Any ‘ai’ that writes code is unable (just like humans)…
-
comment
Comment #45785216
There still maybe some variance at temperature 0. The outputted code could still have errors. LLMs are still bounded by the undecidable problems in computational theory like Rices …
-
comment
Comment #45476272
LLMs and its output are bounded by Rices theorem. This is not going to ensure correctness it’s just going to validate that the model can produce an undecidable result.