Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — deepburner

deepburner

HN member
Joined
Wed, Jan 25, 2017, 9:30 AM UTC
HN karma
263
Public activity
34 items

About deepburner

deepburner@protonmail.ch

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49070908

    I understand vibe coding a website if you only care about putting out the info but this is sloppenheimer levels of garbage. It reeks of stunted, far up its own ass Claude-isms ever…

  2. comment
    Comment #49054754

    I'm no ai maximalist, quite the opposite in fact, and I have a great deal of sympathy for the author as a person from a similar trade. However perhaps he is being overly emotional …

  3. comment
    Comment #45354670

    [flagged]

  4. comment
    Comment #44984897

    I'm rather tired of this ai apologism bit where every downside is explained away as "it would've happened anyways". AI destroying people's brains and causing paychosis? They would'…

  5. comment
    Comment #44846272

    I dont know where that “Those who cannot do, teach” bullshit came from but it's absolute nonsense someone made up to dunk on teachers. It doesnt even make sense in your post becaus…

  6. comment
    Comment #44043482

    This whole article is just a nothingburger. Saying something is applied topology is only one step more advanced than saying something is maths - duh. These mathematical abstraction…

  7. comment
    Comment #42398532

    Good luck helping somebody paralyzed from the neck down live a fulfilling life.

  8. comment
    Comment #42370903

    it... doesn't? threshold theorems are well known.

  9. comment
    Comment #42370807

    I'm sorry if this is nitpicky but your comment is hilarious to me - doubling something is doubling something, "changing the order of magnitude" would entail multiplication by 10.

  10. comment
    Comment #41342219

    Not only you're responding with an ad-hominem, which is blatantly bad enough; but you're doing it against Benjamin Franklin? One of the most influential thinkers of his time who ha…

  11. comment
    Comment #40982734

    Did you really think "they just call them grandma/pa" was a good argument against people not knowing their grandparents' names? What do you think people in other parts of the world…

  12. comment
    Comment #40938333

    "Maybe this person who did this for 20 years did not know what they were doing" is such an HN take.

  13. comment
    Comment #40852345

    Nowhere in the text you quoted (nor in the article body) it is said that simulation of this device can not be done. Had you read the paper you'd see that it _is_ about simulating t…

  14. comment
    Comment #40850480

    The first reference in the article you linked is titled "Computer simulation of Mermin's quantum device".

  15. comment
    Comment #40850314

    > there are known physical phenomena, such as quantum entanglement QC researcher here, strictly speaking, this is false. Clifford circuits can be efficiently simulated classically …

  16. comment
    Comment #39144698

    I am not an expert on this but my suspicion is that human ear is not a linear time invariant system and thus it does not make sense to place a hard cutoff at some frequency over wh…

  17. comment
    Comment #36708637

    What is the point of this comment?

  18. comment
    Comment #36667042

    Quantum Computing is a topic that makes it to the front page from time to time and garners a lot of attention. I find this breakdown of short-term prospects of from QC very concise…

  19. story
  20. comment
    Comment #36581578

    You're talking in very vague terms here, what does """interesting""" mean? Let me give you some numbers. Factorising RSA is order 10^6 logical qubits (and I'm being charitable here…

  21. comment
    Comment #36578386

    Quantum Computing/Information researcher here. This article is largely garbage, the original (~2 month old) paper is surprisingly readable [0] and I suggest you to check it out. He…

  22. comment
    Comment #33844827

    If a real person (not a bot) can tweet more than a 100 tweets per hour (i.e. 1 tweet every 36 seconds on avg) I would call them mentally ill, not power users.

  23. comment
    Comment #33488443

    Yeah mb [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2204.01768.pdf [2] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.11791.pdf

  24. comment
    Comment #33488436

    It really is not because this is a semi-common misconception and to me signals basic unfamiliarity with the subject. Schrodinger's eqn being linear has nothing to do with implement…

  25. comment
    Comment #33485345

    As a person who works in Quantum Computing, I can concur that there's hype in the field; one of the professors in my university has a quantum machine learning (TM) startup that see…