Viewing profile — deep_etcetera
deep_etcetera
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Oct 31, 2018, 10:56 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 60
- Public activity
- 17 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About deep_etcetera
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #31159610
You can see some examples here https://aipaygrad.es/
-
comment
Comment #28201129
Hi, I'm the same age as you, born in the UK but have been working in USA for a few years now. I am also feeling burned out by my job, spend a lot of time fantasizing about retiring…
-
comment
Comment #27888855
I think it will be great if they can create some mechanism to compensate people for their data, I just suspect many people conflate the value of their data as training data and say…
-
comment
Comment #27876508
I'm guessing that since there are hundreds of millions of repositories the typical marginal value of someone's contributions would optimistically be on the order of a few dollars. …
-
comment
Comment #25816864
Yes, if you don't condition on the past moves then the distribution you're modeling is where you randomly pick a 1100 player to choose each move as you say. What I'm saying is that…
-
comment
Comment #25813501
This only true if you select the most likely move instead of sampling from the probability distribution over possible moves. In the latter case there is no reason for there to be a…
-
comment
Comment #24319336
I have no idea why you would find the existence of this machine disappointing. If you wanted to work out something for yourself then you still can.
-
comment
Comment #24266907
It would be more efficient to use drones but precommit to shooting a soldier back in the US whenever a drone gets shot down.
-
comment
Comment #24012644
I don't really understand your point, you don't have to use it to generate the next sentence or paragraph of your story. You can it directly to generate ideas for what comes next b…
-
comment
Comment #23724489
I must agree reading those copypasta, "300 red scares" and "300 confirmed scoots" had me close to tears.
-
comment
Comment #23703107
Imo these are researchers. Their job was to validate their algorithm for doing generative super-resolution on a dataset, they chose the largest and most well-known dataset, it work…
-
comment
Comment #23632978
Maybe it would be helpful if you gave an example of the simplest python function it won't be able to synthesize, and if/when they release the code GPT into the API we can test your…
-
comment
Comment #23492365
Who are you quoting here?
-
comment
Comment #21724145
This article seems pointless without detailing any of the results, why not give some numbers on their performance on benchmarks?
-
comment
Comment #19391258
I doubt a human could learn to become even remotely competitive with only self-play within a human lifetime. Go has improved via a distributed effort, so we should try to estimate …
-
comment
Comment #18350731
Who here can beat 4700 https://www.retrogames.cz/play_124-Atari2600.php?language=EN ?
-
comment
Comment #18349914
This approach will be thwarted if the time is shown in the observation space. If this is so then every kth state will give a novelty reward and every other state will give zero, it…