Viewing profile — decorator

Was there a reason you decided to focus on a subset of consensus protocols? I.e, only blockchains v. blockchains, DAGs, hashgraphs, and any new protocols that may appear.

You're assuming with certainty that there was a causal relationship. Given that assumption you were comfortable in proclaiming the counterfactual to be true. You "knew" it was true…

> But that’s because of aggressive efforts to recruit women, as well as lawsuits, in the 1980s and 1990s, to counteract the long history of discrimination (the field as 95% men in …

You can't reason with ideologues. That's what makes them dangerous. With an inability to entertain an opposing view there can be no course correction.

It seems counterfactuals can be known (according to the downvotes). It must be clear how truth-values can be obtained. I must have missed the news about A/B testing reality. Silly …

You can be sure of a counterfactual? Really.

I hadn't realised that people didn't know what type of data structure Ethereum used.

This may sound radical & all, but I think people may be investing in coins based on things which are other than 'rational'. 'I can calculate the movement of stars, but not the madn…

I think most things can change chains. So I'm not condemning everything.

A blockchain?

That's probably because people think decentralised apps should be decentralised.

If it's on Ethereum, it's not decentralised. Their state is mutable -- as per the DAO.