Viewing profile — debator
debator
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jan 20, 2021, 9:31 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 9
- Public activity
- 13 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About debator
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #25853921
Mmm...impartial curation is certainly difficult to find online. I also wonder how it is in today's political climate compared with 10 years ago - even with teachers. Probably the b…
-
comment
Comment #25853858
Haha. Handling commonly repeated argument forms would be a good feature. Instead of a lengthy comment, just click the "fire in a crowded theater" rebuttal and save everyone some ti…
-
comment
Comment #25853833
> I don't think it's possible anymore to have thoughtful, intelligent political discussions online with both sides. I agree. And that makes it a problem worth solving. I just feel …
-
comment
Comment #25853819
But you'll be back the next day. Can you be banned without the chamber voting on it in some way?
-
comment
Comment #25853805
> Personally, I just acknowledge the selfish motive and use debating as a tool for bringing out ideas from others that I might not have thought of myself, so that I can then incorp…
-
comment
Comment #25853766
What we need is people to be properly incentivized to win whilst arguing the opposing view. From this exercise you will come to understand your opponents view perfectly. But its a …
-
comment
Comment #25853652
Thanks for the link to arguman. Looks really interesting. I'm not the biggest fan of the visual tree and would prefer people not to stray from plain text entry as much as possible …
-
comment
Comment #25853626
> you don't know who you are arguing with and you don't know what positions they actually hold. Good point. A lot of argumentation comes down to whether the arguments they make are…
-
comment
Comment #25853580
> Now if you just want to bring back the old art of rethoric instead of the negatively charged "political debates". You may have a bit more chance. This is the idea. > I think that…
-
comment
Comment #25853540
Wouldn't it be great though if there was such a platform where you could lose your cool with someone without having to be banned, moderated, etc. The ad-hominem part of the argumen…
-
comment
Comment #25853510
Yep, its always "you need to read this to understand", or here is a statistic that proves my point. > I think in-person can be good for very high level arguments, Its good for expl…
-
comment
Comment #25853457
> What I really want is for more people to make good faith efforts to make substantive arguments against their own opinions Agree! A big cause of the divide is that people don't un…
-
story
Ask HN: Would anyone be interested in a Hacker News to debate politics?
HN is usually not the right place for heated debate. Discussions end up in flame wars, vitriolic language, and the moderation is very ad-hoc. But people definitely love to debate. …