Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — ddddddddq

ddddddddq

HN member
Joined
Sun, Aug 02, 2015, 7:34 PM UTC
HN karma
103
Public activity
14 items

About ddddddddq

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #14710492

    You will then refer to the standard to find U+1F351 PEACH and U+1F346 AUBERGINE (Eggplant), and be amazed at the bountiful harvest your friends have had this year.

  2. comment
    Comment #13237347

    From the FAQ[0] > Is it real-time? > The term "real-time" is often misused or misunderstood. We'll define it as "a provable guarantee of meeting an execution deadline when scheduli…

  3. comment
    Comment #13191171

    How would you respond if someone replied with: Yeah, but isn't it in the private roads' owners benefit to reduce congestion, so they create HOV lanes? And what if they want to prom…

  4. comment
    Comment #13154127

    In the Linux kernel context, DRM is "Direct Rendering Manager"

  5. comment
    Comment #12697933

    > Only sites whitelisted by the device can even request permission to connect because the device is integrated into the web security model. > Shady sites cannot even request permis…

  6. comment
    Comment #11883857

    > That was the major point of dispute, since taxi drivers usually get loans to buy these plates knowing that they can re-sell then anytime. Uber changed that. So fundamentally thei…

  7. comment
    Comment #11437002

    Which automobile?

  8. comment
    Comment #11414847

    Why the hell not? It's a proper noun, and we capitalize them. The proper noun "Internet" refers to a specific instance of an "internet", a common noun.

  9. comment
    Comment #10258656

    I would be in favor of any new technology for the web requiring TLS. It provides both a carrot (of new features) and a stick (of falling behind competitors) for people to get off t…

  10. comment
    Comment #10196209

    It only needs access to: Calendar, Internet, SMS, Profile, Start on Boot, Location, Microphone, Call Log, etc...

  11. comment
    Comment #10182709

    Here's the exploit posting that they refer to in the first paragraph: https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/38090/

  12. comment
    Comment #10086067

    By deploying the same certificate/key to every machine you really cut down on the 'private' part of the private key.

  13. comment
    Comment #10079739

    I just want some CA to offer cheap/affordable name constrained CA certs for domains I own. If I own `foo.com`, I should be able to get a cert that can sign certs for `foo.com,*.foo…

  14. comment
    Comment #9992072

    I think I would have to go with this one: https://i.imgur.com/4t5xWq2.png