Viewing profile — ddddddddq
ddddddddq
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Aug 02, 2015, 7:34 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 103
- Public activity
- 14 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ddddddddq
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #14710492
You will then refer to the standard to find U+1F351 PEACH and U+1F346 AUBERGINE (Eggplant), and be amazed at the bountiful harvest your friends have had this year.
-
comment
Comment #13237347
From the FAQ[0] > Is it real-time? > The term "real-time" is often misused or misunderstood. We'll define it as "a provable guarantee of meeting an execution deadline when scheduli…
-
comment
Comment #13191171
How would you respond if someone replied with: Yeah, but isn't it in the private roads' owners benefit to reduce congestion, so they create HOV lanes? And what if they want to prom…
-
comment
Comment #13154127
In the Linux kernel context, DRM is "Direct Rendering Manager"
-
comment
Comment #12697933
> Only sites whitelisted by the device can even request permission to connect because the device is integrated into the web security model. > Shady sites cannot even request permis…
-
comment
Comment #11883857
> That was the major point of dispute, since taxi drivers usually get loans to buy these plates knowing that they can re-sell then anytime. Uber changed that. So fundamentally thei…
-
comment
Comment #11437002
Which automobile?
-
comment
Comment #11414847
Why the hell not? It's a proper noun, and we capitalize them. The proper noun "Internet" refers to a specific instance of an "internet", a common noun.
-
comment
Comment #10258656
I would be in favor of any new technology for the web requiring TLS. It provides both a carrot (of new features) and a stick (of falling behind competitors) for people to get off t…
-
comment
Comment #10196209
It only needs access to: Calendar, Internet, SMS, Profile, Start on Boot, Location, Microphone, Call Log, etc...
-
comment
Comment #10182709
Here's the exploit posting that they refer to in the first paragraph: https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/38090/
-
comment
Comment #10086067
By deploying the same certificate/key to every machine you really cut down on the 'private' part of the private key.
-
comment
Comment #10079739
I just want some CA to offer cheap/affordable name constrained CA certs for domains I own. If I own `foo.com`, I should be able to get a cert that can sign certs for `foo.com,*.foo…
-
comment
Comment #9992072
I think I would have to go with this one: https://i.imgur.com/4t5xWq2.png