Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — dcousens

dcousens

HN member
Joined
Tue, Jul 29, 2014, 3:14 AM UTC
HN karma
46
Public activity
20 items

About dcousens

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #16627421

    I think it depends on where you draw the line for the word "natural". If you include human behaviour, it is natural, but yes, otherwise it is typically known as "artificial selecti…

  2. comment
    Comment #15380680

    Opposite experience here. Near 4-5x slower than actual HN for me.

  3. story
  4. comment
    Comment #14861520

    Therefore, you could consider the "need" for this to happen in the first place, a "late-stage" flaw of capitalism. I think you agree with the OP?

  5. comment
    Comment #14643228

    Maybe the data usage would have alerted the infected.

  6. comment
    Comment #14603475

    This mirrored my confusion when `AES_cbc_encrypt` modified my IV data when _decrypting_.

  7. comment
    Comment #14568008

    Easy. Vim doesn't get in my way.

  8. comment
    Comment #14202543

    52 attempts first here, then 25 then 20... exactly the same thought process.

  9. comment
    Comment #13204593

    How does a code base become so cumbersome, without someone signalling that there will be a price to pay?

  10. comment
  11. comment
    Comment #13143616

    If you moved your scripts to 1st party, uMatrix wouldn't block it

  12. comment
    Comment #13129377

    Honestly, just being able to "tick" each commit would be great. On https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/ it is common practice to include the commit hash in your approval comment so …

  13. comment
    Comment #12586779

    I just use `notify-send` every 30 minutes... https://github.com/dcousens/dotfiles/blob/master/.xinitstatu... .

  14. comment
    Comment #12154939

    The graph displayed of ECDSA duplicate r-value exploits shows 2 prominent "columns" of addresses, the latter of which was in April/May 2014. That latter column was directly related…

  15. comment
    Comment #12153114

    That point when you realise you're responsible for the data in someones presentation.

  16. story
  17. story
  18. story
  19. comment
    Comment #8106310

    You're not wrong. Thanks for pointing this out, thankfully the implementation already failed on a negative s value, but you're correct in that it wasn't definitive. I also whole-he…

  20. comment
    Comment #8102062

    Its not really a bug, the operations after it would still be valid (it is almost immediately reduced to the field order), its just that those parameters would not be akin to the SE…