Viewing profile — dccsillag
dccsillag
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Mar 21, 2023, 7:00 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 70
- Public activity
- 24 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About dccsillag
https://dccsillag.xyz/
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47557309
I'm sorry, but what exactly is the problem with the code? I've been staring at it for quite a while now and still don't see what is counterintuitive about it.
-
comment
Comment #45197021
Take enough moments and you'll be able to differentiate any distributions.
-
comment
Comment #44781622
I think you vastly overestimate the capacity of Python typing.
-
comment
Comment #44584792
Typing still sucks big time. Same for perf, unless you are working with numerics that fit with something like NumPy or JAX.
-
comment
Comment #43972749
No, it's generally not valid -- it will depend on the specifics of the test (especially if the test is valid only asymptotically). You need some method that supports sequential inf…
-
comment
Comment #43594913
Hard disagree. There are a lot of implementation "details" that, if you want to do properly, are a lot of hard work and very much nontrivial. For example, do try to write a compile…
-
comment
Comment #43301447
I've never seen this done in a research setting. Not sure about how much of a standard practice it is.
-
comment
Comment #42925788
It has `catch_unwind` [1], but that still retains the panicking runtime, so not sufficient in the context of the post. [1] https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/panic/fn.catch_unwind.html
-
comment
Comment #42925066
Yeah, I'm fairly sure that there is such a flag/toplevel attribute... and if there isn't, there should be one. It also feels like most of the pains on avoiding panics centers aroun…
-
comment
Comment #42807318
Can we please rename this submission? This is excessively grandiose, way over the top......
-
comment
Comment #42670248
If I'm not mistaken, the treatment of forward declarations proposed in the article actually breaks the C standard, which would be a rather pressing concern. As far as I am aware, t…
-
comment
Comment #42565657
If thresholding of P-values is the issue, E-values -- a recent, much more elegant, easier to work with, and more robust alternative to P-values -- solve this. https://arxiv.org/abs…
-
comment
Comment #42521835
I've used Quiver a number of times now, and all of them were great experiences. Kudos to the authors!
-
comment
Comment #42501944
(Side note) That's odd, lobste.rs seems to be down for me, and has been like that for a couple of months now -- I literally cannot reach the site. Is that actually just me?? EDIT: …
-
comment
Comment #42469997
Well, yes, but that's an extremely low bar!!
-
comment
Comment #42292425
I find it odd that all of the mathematicians cited at the end are actually pretty much CS people, working on proof assistants. Kinda renders that section pointless, IMO (though the…
-
comment
Comment #42217353
Theory-wise, I'm not convinced that the models have good approximation properties (the Kolmogorov-Arnold / Kolmogorov Superposition Theorem they base themselves on has quite a bit …
-
comment
Comment #42211129
Ah, Kolmogorov Arnold Networks. Perhaps the only model I have ever tried that managed to fairly often get AUCs below 0.5 in my tabular ML benchmarks. It even managed to get a frank…
-
comment
Comment #42211116
Yeah, I know the account you are talking about, it really is a bit over the top. It's a shame, I've met a bunch of people who mentioned that they were actually turned away from Con…
-
comment
Comment #42211092
That's a particular form of Conformal Prediction, called Split Conformal Prediction. Incidentally, it's also one of the best ones (i.e., most extensible, strongest guarantees, easi…
-
comment
Comment #42209710
Bayesian Neural Networks just seem like a failed approach, unfortunately. For one, Bayesian inference and UQ fundamentally depends on the choice of the prior, but this is rarely di…
-
comment
Comment #42122134
And the potential outcomes framework (Neyman-Rubin) is even more general :) Either way, Holland's 'Statistics and Causal Inference' paper (1986) is a nice read on the different fra…
-
comment
Comment #35252103
> All know 20 year old latex documents will be compilable in 20 years. Except it's not. For example, in 2021, the NeurIPS template compiled differently in different versions of TeX…
-
comment
Comment #35250918
Because a library in a programming language would be madly inconvenient? I can't see something like this being pleasant to use: document( paragraph("blah blah blah"), math("sum_(i=…