Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — dccsillag

dccsillag

HN member
Joined
Tue, Mar 21, 2023, 7:00 PM UTC
HN karma
70
Public activity
24 items

About dccsillag

I'm an applied mathematician working on machine learning, statistics and compilers.

https://dccsillag.xyz/

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #47557309

    I'm sorry, but what exactly is the problem with the code? I've been staring at it for quite a while now and still don't see what is counterintuitive about it.

  2. comment
    Comment #45197021

    Take enough moments and you'll be able to differentiate any distributions.

  3. comment
    Comment #44781622

    I think you vastly overestimate the capacity of Python typing.

  4. comment
    Comment #44584792

    Typing still sucks big time. Same for perf, unless you are working with numerics that fit with something like NumPy or JAX.

  5. comment
    Comment #43972749

    No, it's generally not valid -- it will depend on the specifics of the test (especially if the test is valid only asymptotically). You need some method that supports sequential inf…

  6. comment
    Comment #43594913

    Hard disagree. There are a lot of implementation "details" that, if you want to do properly, are a lot of hard work and very much nontrivial. For example, do try to write a compile…

  7. comment
    Comment #43301447

    I've never seen this done in a research setting. Not sure about how much of a standard practice it is.

  8. comment
    Comment #42925788

    It has `catch_unwind` [1], but that still retains the panicking runtime, so not sufficient in the context of the post. [1] https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/panic/fn.catch_unwind.html

  9. comment
    Comment #42925066

    Yeah, I'm fairly sure that there is such a flag/toplevel attribute... and if there isn't, there should be one. It also feels like most of the pains on avoiding panics centers aroun…

  10. comment
    Comment #42807318

    Can we please rename this submission? This is excessively grandiose, way over the top......

  11. comment
    Comment #42670248

    If I'm not mistaken, the treatment of forward declarations proposed in the article actually breaks the C standard, which would be a rather pressing concern. As far as I am aware, t…

  12. comment
    Comment #42565657

    If thresholding of P-values is the issue, E-values -- a recent, much more elegant, easier to work with, and more robust alternative to P-values -- solve this. https://arxiv.org/abs…

  13. comment
    Comment #42521835

    I've used Quiver a number of times now, and all of them were great experiences. Kudos to the authors!

  14. comment
    Comment #42501944

    (Side note) That's odd, lobste.rs seems to be down for me, and has been like that for a couple of months now -- I literally cannot reach the site. Is that actually just me?? EDIT: …

  15. comment
    Comment #42469997

    Well, yes, but that's an extremely low bar!!

  16. comment
    Comment #42292425

    I find it odd that all of the mathematicians cited at the end are actually pretty much CS people, working on proof assistants. Kinda renders that section pointless, IMO (though the…

  17. comment
    Comment #42217353

    Theory-wise, I'm not convinced that the models have good approximation properties (the Kolmogorov-Arnold / Kolmogorov Superposition Theorem they base themselves on has quite a bit …

  18. comment
    Comment #42211129

    Ah, Kolmogorov Arnold Networks. Perhaps the only model I have ever tried that managed to fairly often get AUCs below 0.5 in my tabular ML benchmarks. It even managed to get a frank…

  19. comment
    Comment #42211116

    Yeah, I know the account you are talking about, it really is a bit over the top. It's a shame, I've met a bunch of people who mentioned that they were actually turned away from Con…

  20. comment
    Comment #42211092

    That's a particular form of Conformal Prediction, called Split Conformal Prediction. Incidentally, it's also one of the best ones (i.e., most extensible, strongest guarantees, easi…

  21. comment
    Comment #42209710

    Bayesian Neural Networks just seem like a failed approach, unfortunately. For one, Bayesian inference and UQ fundamentally depends on the choice of the prior, but this is rarely di…

  22. comment
    Comment #42122134

    And the potential outcomes framework (Neyman-Rubin) is even more general :) Either way, Holland's 'Statistics and Causal Inference' paper (1986) is a nice read on the different fra…

  23. comment
    Comment #35252103

    > All know 20 year old latex documents will be compilable in 20 years. Except it's not. For example, in 2021, the NeurIPS template compiled differently in different versions of TeX…

  24. comment
    Comment #35250918

    Because a library in a programming language would be madly inconvenient? I can't see something like this being pleasant to use: document( paragraph("blah blah blah"), math("sum_(i=…