Viewing profile — dboon

Thanks for the reply, I'm sure you're also just a regular person writing about the stuff you like and regardless of whether you end up agreeing with me or deciding that, no, that w…

I promise I'm not normally uptight like this, but there's a difference between having a laugh and whatever this is. Like I said, this feels (a) legitimately angry and (b) in a spit…

This prose feels extremely angry and ungenerous; abstractly, I agree with a lot of the points, but when I read this: > My conclusion is that OpenCode is clown-car turboslop with a …

I remain deeply unconvinced. I respect your writing and opinion enough to have actually put chunks of the essay into Pangram, including the part you label "blatantly Claude", and..…

What? This is one of the most clearly human written articles I could imagine. Can you explain what you mean?

Yeah, recreating Conan minus the foundational idea stated at the beginning of the post. Yup.

I am making Cargo for C. I have 3/4 of a working demo; the tool can build itself, including some non-trivial dependencies which I've ported to build natively with the tool (instead…

The library provides a few basic allocators.

A comment from a legend. Thanks for reading and thanks for the response! I agree; the dynamic array is typed as a T* for ergonomics sake but is similarly a pointer and a length (an…

I have no philosophical complaints with supporting odd architectures in general. I agree that most obscure targets are probably not that much code, since the library is factored wi…

People are very silly and very entitled. I'd bend over backward to help anyone contribute to or use the library in any way. In response, all I ask is for some common courtesy and f…

Haha jk…but really? Lol just kidding…unless?

Yeah, AI has done a number to this place

No problem and thanks for the apology. Happens to the best of us. Regardless, thanks for the comment — I definitely didn’t mean to slip by the pthread stuff on a “well technically …

Thanks! I didn’t know this.

Thanks for reading and thanks for the link. I'll read anything DJB wrote.

It...is not a libc implementation. That's an impressive level of misunderstanding!

It looks like I need to update my macOS machine! Thanks for the sanity, and thanks for reading.

Man, this place has become strange. This person has no idea who I am. But thanks for commenting on my 'library' nonetheless!

Thank you, but why's that?

Yes, unfortunately the threading primitives require libc. Ditto subprocesses. It's on my list. But regarding: "Oops... apparently this is vibecoded. Welp, I just wasted ten minutes…