Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — dbcpp

dbcpp

HN member
Joined
Fri, May 26, 2023, 11:35 AM UTC
HN karma
60
Public activity
14 items

About dbcpp

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
  2. comment
  3. comment
    Comment #46577353

    True, in that case it should just adopt the noexcept status of the object it holds.

  4. comment
    Comment #46576056

    I would argue performance-noexcept-move-constructor should always be on. Move constructors should almost always be noexcept since they typically just move pointers around and don't…

  5. comment
    Comment #46403709

    The scale and stakes of the investment now are much, much higher now than in dot com. Likewise, don't assume I'm more bearish than I am. But enormous investment requires more benef…

  6. comment
    Comment #46403167

    Quite a large bubble. The burden of proof for demonstrating the enormous economic value LLMs are providing really is yours. Sure, there are anecdotal benefits to using LLMs, but we…

  7. comment
    Comment #46394334

    I'm not saying LLMs are useless. But the value they have provided so far does not justify covering the country in datacenters and the scale of investment overall (not even close!).…

  8. comment
    Comment #46393789

    Firstly, it's not really good enough to say "our employees use it" and therefore it's providing us significant value as a business. It's also not good enough to say "our programmer…

  9. comment
    Comment #46392667

    The thing that drives me crazy is that it isn't even clear if AI is providing economic value yet (am I missing something there?). Right now trillions of dollars are being spent on …

  10. comment
    Comment #46359867

    Related to this, I've been wondering how much we should actually be depending on RLS for. There are known timing attacks against it [1]. [1] https://www.cs.tau.ac.il/~mad/publicati…

  11. comment
    Comment #40857298

    Yes, that's true. And not even ClickHouse considers their MergeTree engine to be an LSM-tree (see https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/blob/bfc0260f359a0c... ). That doesn't ma…

  12. comment
    Comment #40853254

    I actually think you're describing a WAL.

  13. comment
    Comment #40853015

    The original purpose of an LSM-tree is to take I/O off the critical path of a write (there are other reasons to use them though, for example reducing space amplification). I would …

  14. comment
    Comment #40850661

    LSM-trees do need a WAL. The entire idea of LSM-trees is that writes are buffered in memory and written out all at once. But a particular write doesn't wait for the memtable to be …