Viewing profile — davorak
davorak
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Aug 17, 2010, 12:07 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,269
- Public activity
- 811 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About davorak
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48708151
It can be hosted in multiple locations. I guess if the github UI becomes critical to their continued development or PR then they expose themselves to a potential rug pull by github…
-
comment
Comment #48209673
> Meta should exit the US too because the US does {x} that I don't agree with. This can be a real argument and conversation but we would need to know what {x} is and the causal cha…
-
comment
Comment #48130066
Open ai and similar companies could open the doors to academic researchers to figure out the stats of help vs harm. It is not going to be a short term and perhaps not long term pro…
-
comment
Comment #48130049
> I don't buy that chatGPT is actually doing these users any harm. For me to buy this as true I would expect that those people would be as well off or as bad off if chatGPT was in …
-
comment
Comment #47821311
Extra time commitment, and therefor missing some sleep, can start before the baby is born.
-
comment
Comment #47568701
> adequately explained by stupidity What is the adequate explanation via stupidity in this case though? If there is one that sure maybe we should lean that way without further evid…
-
comment
Comment #47568404
I have a CO2 detector at home and bought some for family members, but I have never had a portable one so they stay at home. Some of the high CO2 ppm numbers in the article make me …
-
comment
Comment #47568293
> In the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic I learned that we can estimate our level of risk by checking the concentration of carbon dioxide in the air, because when infected peop…
-
comment
Comment #47421544
> I didn't see that anywhere in the text... You are right it is hard to use it for anything else though given the constraints. > An operator that receives a signal in accordance wi…
-
comment
Comment #47420638
> The point is that you can't just externalize age verification and expect that data to never be sent to facebook facebook and similar social media companies have a ton of ways to …
-
comment
Comment #47418452
> Now that you know that facebook isn't pushing this law to protect anyone's anonymity why do you think they're doing it? My comment was not about what I knew/know about facebook o…
-
comment
Comment #47418367
Unlike the California law, I seemed to be in the minority in this opinion, this one does seem to require programs like grep to ask for a users age bracket. > (b) An operator shall …
-
comment
Comment #47418144
It gives the parents the tools to age restrict things, but does not require parents to use them or use them well.
-
comment
Comment #47418121
> Why? I think that main goal would be to keep the ability to have accounts be anonymous or pseudo anonymous. If social mean company has to verify an accounts age themselves they t…
-
comment
Comment #47418087
> trusted 3rd party service So we have to pay some 3rd party service to hoard information about Children? Why we want to set that up? Why would we want to take that power from the …
-
comment
Comment #47416989
Does the technology already exist? Things are almost never only a tech issue alone. That does not mean tech can not help, even if the tech that would help is currently impractical.…
-
comment
Comment #47409070
> You can’t serve up intentionally stale information without inviting legal repercussions. > These are being revised and updated right up until the point they are released to provi…
-
comment
Comment #47409056
> it requires substantial interpretation of things that the database does not and cannot contain. Do you have examples? This seems like something that is a solvable problem, and fr…
-
comment
Comment #47369046
> Nobody is going to stop using grammarly extensions to post to HN, nobody is going to be able to detect its usage. I do not think the new rules or for this use case or at least no…
-
comment
Comment #47366329
Historically, like 10-20 years ago, libertarian would be staunchly pro privacy. Is this no longer the case? If libertarians have dropped this stance, since it is so close to what w…
-
comment
Comment #47360053
Dang's search is much more clear cut and I think that is going to be better guide to what the enforcement will look like. Looking at your search though I think we have to exclude t…
-
comment
Comment #47358160
One example of voice is of retreading old ground over and over, taking a long time to give evidence or get to the point. Content expressed with this voice is hard to extract from t…
-
comment
Comment #47357145
As of this comment which ones are you finding wrong? 5 of the first 7 are confessed ai users, the other 2 look like ai to me too.
-
comment
Comment #47353486
> Where does the line fall? For now I would argue when ai edits for you instead of helping you edit. Take a look at the examples that Dang posted if you have not yet: https://news.…
-
comment
Comment #47347326
The typical problem with trying to create clear standards with no spirit of the law is that it never matches the intentions with the 1st, 2nd, etc iterations of developing the clea…