Viewing profile — davemp
davemp
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jul 28, 2017, 4:49 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,518
- Public activity
- 778 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About davemp
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49221009
> A 1963 house is what we'd think of today as a starter home. Not every house at that time was a post war levitown style shack. AC wasn’t even terribly uncommon in 1960s constructi…
-
comment
Comment #49105125
Great for rich people or just not your relative purchasing power being completely eroded. Why work for a 5% raise if it means all your expenses go up 5%?
-
comment
Comment #49065493
> That's not remotely true. Or, more formally speaking since we're in a thread about proof assistants, it's not remotely true, up to extensional equality, plus some choices about w…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #49064953
Cool. Now we can write bugs in our theorem descriptions instead of source code. Seriously, please review Curry Howard Isomorphism if you’re getting pulled down this rabbit hole. Pr…
-
comment
Comment #49000169
> No one is going to argue against those vague statements. He obviously does not agree with people that put more weight on making things compile errors instead of runtime errors >>…
-
comment
Comment #48992387
Looks like Mr. Kelly agrees with you. From the zen of zig: - Runtime crashes are better than bugs. - Compile errors are better than runtime crashes. - Incremental improvements. - A…
-
comment
Comment #48984745
Without explicitly entering the language holy wars. I think there’s an interesting trade-off here. Static analysis based approaches restrict what is possible to express in the lang…
-
comment
Comment #48872376
I don’t think people are arguing to stop researching AGI. Moreso against sales people trying to use the concept of AGI to sell products that are very much not AGI. Or devoting so m…
-
comment
Comment #48872321
> clueless and stubborn and confidently wrong Uhuh. I really shouldn’t be replying to this type of comment from a throwaway. But the extremely powerful semantic search that we get …
-
comment
Comment #48871433
There is a vast gulf between theoretically possible and technologically feasible. If you can’t provide a realistic path to achieve something, you’re asking people to believe in sci…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48825486
Totally insane that they enshrine this stuff in law without a reference design and corresponding data to validate its effectiveness.
-
comment
Comment #48803654
Yeah I think that’s the difference. On the east coast in July, the big safety risk with fireworks is generally to your own person.
-
comment
Comment #48803350
EDA tools have been using ML techniques for >10yrs afaik
-
comment
Comment #48699389
It definitely isn’t simple, but it’s a pretty well trod path. If the FCC or state equivalent doesn’t have folks who can write the spec that’s a huge problem. I would be surprised i…
-
comment
Comment #48679761
Article reeks of LLM mannerisms in a pretty obnoxious way. I read it anyways and surprise surprise, it boils down to: - Ridiculously NP problem space that we guess and check with M…
-
comment
Comment #48659047
Picking up on some dunning kruger effect here. Programming isn’t even a field in the same way as prob&stats. Computer science does in fact have non-deterministic sub fields such as…
-
comment
Comment #48540174
Just because it could be worse doesn’t mean it couldn’t be better.
-
comment
Comment #48535948
> Would you want to take a pay cut if your employer was having financial problems? This happens constantly in the form of layoffs…
-
comment
Comment #48459266
Ah yes. Just need to displace 16 million people’s livelihoods. No big deal.
-
comment
Comment #48431321
I assume because most windows installs are corporate IT garbage that if anyone cared about performance they could just turn off one of the three endpoint protection services or tun…
-
comment
Comment #48368570
> One third of all software code is written by AI. I find it interesting that using lines of code as a metric is making a comeback.
-
comment
Comment #48303774
I’m pretty certain there are physiological limits that you can’t just muscle through and stress _can_ be an indicator that you’re reaching said limits.
-
comment
Comment #48178938
usage != positive opinion I don’t like driving in traffic yet I do it pretty much every day. Why don’t I simply not drive?