Viewing profile — dave_taht
dave_taht
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Apr 15, 2022, 5:15 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 39
- Public activity
- 23 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About dave_taht
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #34133243
hackernews gets ipv6 support.
- story
-
comment
Comment #33706347
I keep hoping everyone will have that Aha! moment one day, and we'll all have cake. https://libreqos.io
-
comment
Comment #33447600
so nice to see so many using cake.
-
comment
Comment #33447591
So happy to see so many sqm and cake users here.
-
comment
Comment #33447583
apple's location services have cost me MUCH grief in developing newer versions of fq_codel for wifi, until we figured it out.
-
comment
Comment #33447575
I'm always interested in packet captures of observed misbehavior.
-
comment
Comment #33447569
that is a dismal ratio. I would set cake to turn on the ack-filter in this case on the upload. Also try comparing cake besteffort with your fq_codel implementation. MOST likely, fr…
-
comment
Comment #33447555
So nice to see gfblip and cake together again at long last.
-
comment
Comment #33194131
The openwrt folk have released a similar vpn idea, using the kernel wireguard version and a DHT: https://forum.openwrt.org/t/new-wireguard-based-openwrt-vpn-... works on std linux …
- story
-
comment
Comment #33057294
NSF finally has a program that makes sense to support better open source orgs: https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2022/nsf22062/nsf22062.jsp Don't everyone apply at once!
-
comment
Comment #33056108
flent.org has some heavy duty, wonderful graphic tests.
- story
-
comment
Comment #32818144
Mikrotik RouterOS7 supports fq_codel running native. Does that not work on 2.5Gbit -> 1Gbit?
- story
-
comment
Comment #31318153
Remarkable piece of work that didn't mention #bufferbloat once. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1puRjUVxJ6cCv-rgQ_zn-jWZU...
-
comment
Comment #31152754
At least some hardware provides the timestamp for you. Ideally if that's carried along with the packet, it measures the load on the whole system, so when you start dropping packets…
-
comment
Comment #31150466
The principal use case for any AQM is when stepping down from one speed to another, in the case of wireless, wildly variable rates, or in the case of 10Gbit to 1Gbit on a port (rfc…
- story
-
comment
Comment #31047046
Perhaps this graphic will help: https://www.domos.no/news-updates/latency-explained-in-a-pag...
-
comment
Comment #31042848
Re: Latency: 35% I would substitute "baseline latency" to the DFZ as this number, and also report on "working latency". https://www.bitag.org/documents/BITAG_latency_explained.pdf …
-
comment
Comment #31042815
Re: Packet Loss: .08% Packet loss is a pointless metric for consumers, impossible to represent or calculate accurately within the ISP, and does not belong on a consumer facing labe…