Viewing profile — darthoctopus
darthoctopus
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Apr 26, 2017, 9:35 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 616
- Public activity
- 78 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About darthoctopus
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49175118
Yes, in my field (astronomy), Overleaf is also ubiquitous, especially for observational papers with long author lists. However, by the same token, this means that most of my collab…
-
comment
Comment #49160892
Thank you for pandoc. I made the (at the time perhaps not transparently wise) choice to go all in on it when I started my PhD, and that decision has paid nothing but dividends sinc…
-
comment
Comment #48342736
What is definitely being argued unironically is "it doesn't matter that humans are sentient", and I would still consider that misanthropy
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48255442
this kind of overt inevitabilism is complicity in the death of good writing.
-
comment
Comment #48177691
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandolini%27s_law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firehose_of_falsehood https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flood_the_zone
-
comment
Comment #48177643
Can we finally stop having business people forcing product decisions on us? Microsoft's recent history suggests not… and I fear the facade of empowerment by LLM will only make thin…
-
comment
Comment #47897695
> You have not heard any of the many, many excitable AI maximalists in the media address this reality, the bits vs atoms barrier, because they have no response that can preserve th…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #47548876
subtlety is dead on the internet of the lowest common denominator, and that enabled by AI assistance is very low indeed
-
comment
Comment #47495706
wanting to be good at something is not exactly the same as being interested in getting good at something, which carries the additional, nuanced, connotation of investment (or willi…
-
comment
Comment #47487729
> don't want to put in the human time and effort to do so In most circles, that is "not that interested in getting good at it".
-
comment
Comment #47450977
> Who is forced to use it? Just use X11, as you said (many times) you do already. I can no longer use GNOME on X11, and the decision to remove support was a deliberate one. Users a…
-
comment
Comment #47173008
> Why is that not going to happen next time? Because this shortage isn't natural, it's the result of OpenAI flexing monopsony power to deprive everyone else for its strategic gain.…
-
comment
Comment #47172938
Lest we forget, this memory shortage was deliberately engineered [1]. Thanks, OpenAI. [1]: https://www.mooreslawisdead.com/post/sam-altman-s-dirty-dram...
-
comment
Comment #47147950
what _is_ that reason, out of curiosity?
-
comment
Comment #46809071
I think you may have fundamentally misunderstood what a technocracy is: it has nothing to do with tech companies whatsoever. From literally the article that you have linked: > The …
-
comment
Comment #46449013
I would absolutely love for this proposed blocker to happen, but I have zero faith in it actually happening given the user-centred nature of this feature and the user-hostile origi…
-
comment
Comment #46169439
every one of these things that make the deal "good" for OpenAI is a direct result of negative externalities for everyone else : competitors, consumers, and people who wouldn't care…
-
comment
Comment #46055373
Indeed, I find it very hard to take the article seriously given that every one of the notionally decentralised trends it's described has propagated on a very small handful of highl…
-
comment
Comment #45634424
that is the point of Luddism! the original Luddite movement was not ipso facto opposed to progress, but rather to the societal harm caused by society-scale economic obsolescence. t…
-
comment
Comment #45272746
> Throughout Europe, though not in America, there is a third class of men, more respected than either of the classes of workers. These are men who, through ownership of land, are a…
-
comment
Comment #45107102
perhaps read the actual first paragraph of the article? the whole point of it is that, whether we call it that or not, our privately run reputation scores (including but not limite…
-
comment
Comment #45106812
Did you even read the article? Here is the situation in China: > Here's what's actually happening. As of 2024, there's still no nationwide social credit score in China. Most privat…
-
comment
Comment #44821384
that is the point --- precisely because the usual mechanisms of enforcement do not apply, there will be no accountability for Apple.