Viewing profile — darinf
darinf
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Mar 20, 2014, 11:37 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 83
- Public activity
- 52 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About darinf
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45768405
Electron works differently. It runs in process, similar to how a normal Chromium embedding works (like Chrome itself).
-
comment
Comment #45765282
Mobile is a different story for sure and for many reasons. We will be bringing this same architecture to Windows. It will fit it well there, and in many ways Windows is already wel…
-
comment
Comment #45764641
Glad to finally be able to share Atlas with the world last week! There's a lot of novelty under the hood. While Atlas is using Chromium, it's not built on top of Chromium in the us…
- story
-
comment
Comment #33633510
^^^ this
-
comment
Comment #33540726
fullscreen != fullwindow Cmd+s in Arc just hides all the UI of the browser but does not change the size of the window frame. This is more akin to Chrome's add shortcut to desktop f…
-
comment
Comment #32760744
What bugs will we get this time?
-
comment
Comment #32632547
Yeah you end up designing models not to be logically separated but to instead isolate updates to Views. In theory those should align but they don’t always. And the method of findin…
-
comment
Comment #32632503
So wish they would decouple SwiftUI from the OS releases and opensource it!
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #31898334
I’m excited to try this out. The idea of cloud hosted browsers is not new, but this approach seems really promising. In this era of connectivity and cloud compute, it makes so much…
-
comment
Comment #31846422
Nope. Chrome usage is free traffic to google.com/search. Chrome usage is the high order bit. The rest is gravy.
-
comment
Comment #31839007
Yes they can act unilaterally and with Chrome OS and many popular web apps they do have incentive to care about the web. But will that translate to the Chrome organization caring? …
-
comment
Comment #31836435
A side-effect of a Chromium-only web is that it gives the Chrome team at Google less incentive to invest in the web platform. It used to be a way to differentiate Chrome from other…
-
comment
Comment #31423651
Check out cookie cutter by Neeva: https://neeva.com/blog/introducing-cookie-cutter-by-neeva-a-...
-
comment
Comment #31423201
Check out Neeva. This is what we are all about.
-
comment
Comment #31423166
$5 / mo for a premium Neeva subscription or just use the free tier to experience ad-free search focused on the user. I left Google to join Neeva so I could be part of building a be…
-
comment
Comment #31423138
DDG is just repackaged Bing with their own ads inserted.
-
comment
Comment #31423131
Working on much of this at Neeva. We have a free tier, no ads cluttering the results. Just focused on the user experience. We also offer a premium tier for those who are keen to su…
-
comment
Comment #31422874
This is why I left Google to join Neeva. Check us out. Unlike the alternatives, we are truly investing in our search stack. Unfortunately there’s just too much inertia with the ads…
-
comment
Comment #30928538
Yes you are correct. Google Desktop Search. Connected Apps in Neeva is similar but better. It supports indexing more apps, like Figma and GitHub.
-
comment
Comment #30925646
Exactly. Notice how "I'm feeling lucky" is only on the home page and not part of the search experience when using Chrome or any modern browser where you search from the URL bar? Wo…
-
comment
Comment #30925611
I was talking about mobile. As for desktop, Instant Search was serving up full page results instantly, which included ads. That's a different thing altogether, and of course, in th…
-
comment
Comment #30922810
Actually, just taking the ads out of the experience can make for a simpler and better search experience. I think the google founders knew this too ( https://www.reddit.com/r/degoog…