Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — dannysullivan

dannysullivan

HN member
Joined
Sat, Jun 07, 2008, 12:18 AM UTC
HN karma
577
Public activity
189 items

About dannysullivan

Google's public liaison of Search, helping people better understand search & Google better hear public feedback: https://twitter.com/searchliaison

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #38929165

    I work for Google Search. Apologies for this! It’s been fixed now and posted to our search status dashboard https://status.search.google.com/incidents/hySMmncEDZ7Xpaf9i...

  2. comment
    Comment #38166507

    I absolutely don't think it's a laughing matter. I made a joke in the interview with the reporter as a kind of icebreaker (which clearly didn't seem to go well). But as I also expl…

  3. comment
    Comment #38166428

    It's because when I was interviewed, what I said was all speaking officially for Google. You can attribute anything there to the company directly. My blog post -- I wrote that on m…

  4. comment
    Comment #38166360

    I know it was a long post I made. But yes, I (and we) recognize people want the results better. I covered this at the end (along with some other parts): "That said, there’s room to…

  5. comment
    Comment #38166303

    I get this view. But as my post explains, I'd quit writing about search. I was done. There wasn't going to be more criticism (or praise or whatever) from me because I'd retired fro…

  6. comment
    Comment #37649041

    I was on vacation when this came up, so playing some catch up. I work for Google Search. I've been very involved with the concerns raised about quoted searches last year, especiall…

  7. comment
    Comment #37182898

    "They say that old content does actually affect a site in terms of it’s average ranking" -- We didn't say this. We said the exact opposite.

  8. comment
    Comment #37081814

    You're asking about freshness, not oldness. IE: we have systems that are designed to show fresh content, relatively speaking -- matter of days. It's not the same as "this article i…

  9. comment
    Comment #37079560

    No. I don't code. I'm not an engineer. That doesn't mean I can't communicate how Google Search works. And our systems do not calculate how much "old" content is on a site to determ…

  10. comment
    Comment #37079330

    There is. Which is why I specifically talked only about writing for algorithmic systems. Machine learning systems are different, and not everyone fully understands how they work, o…

  11. comment
    Comment #37079292

    I actually work for our search quality team, and my job is to foster two-way communication between the search quality team and those outside Google. When issues come up outside Goo…

  12. comment
    Comment #37079253

    No. But it's also complicated, as Matt did thinks beyond web spam. Matt worked within the search quality team, and he communicated a lot from search quality to the outside world ab…

  13. comment
    Comment #37079199

    thanks, Ernie!

  14. comment
    Comment #37079186

    I'm the source. I officially work for Google. The account is verified by X. It's followed by the official Google account. It links to my personal account; my personal account links…

  15. comment
    Comment #37079126

    That Googler here. I do use Google! And yeah, I get sometimes people want older content and we show fresher content. We have systems designed to show fresher content when it seems …

  16. comment
    Comment #37079050

    It's not from Google PR. It's from me. I'm the public liaison for Google Search. I work for our search quality team, not for our PR team. It's not worded in any way intended to be …

  17. comment
    Comment #37078765

    No one has demonstrated that simply removing content that's "old" means we think a site is "fresh" and therefore should do better. There are people who perhaps updated older conten…

  18. comment
    Comment #37078733

    This is our guidance about how people should see themselves to create helpful content to succeed in Google Search: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/creat... T…

  19. comment
    Comment #37078713

    We don't have a policy or any guidance saying to remove old content. That said, we absolutely recognize a responsibility to help creators understand how to succeed and what not to …

  20. comment
    Comment #37078691

    I work for our search quality team, directly reporting to the head of that team, to help explain how search works to people outside Google and bring concerns and feedback back into…

  21. comment
    Comment #37078632

    "We've been diligently working to improve the results" was the response to the question of "Are the employees at Google working on Search aware of how bad search results have becom…

  22. comment
    Comment #37077897

    No one has demonstrated getting rid of "old" content somehow makes the rest of the site "fresh" and therefore ranks better. What's likely the case is that some people have updated …

  23. comment
    Comment #37077866

    We've been diligently working to improve the results through things like our helpful content system, and that work is continuing. You can read about some of it in a recent post her…

  24. comment
    Comment #37077821

    I work for Google and do come into HN occasionally. See my profile and my comments here. I'd come more often if it were easier to know when there's something Google Search-related …

  25. comment
    Comment #37077786

    The engineers at Google do know how our algorithmic systems work because they write them. And the engineers I work with at Google looking at the article about this found it strange…