Viewing profile — danny_codes
danny_codes
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Apr 19, 2020, 3:39 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,223
- Public activity
- 685 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About danny_codes
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49238557
I mean I'm talking about a specific policy proposal, for which people have done the analysis. Piketty has several books on the subject you can read. The tax structure is simply des…
-
comment
Comment #49238494
Or reform your legal system? I mean it's clearly not working very well, time for a change.
-
comment
Comment #49238488
Bro is delusional. The only reason there aren't 45 LLM competitors is compute costs. Once costs fall the tech will commoditize. It is interesting that a role like "Head of Strategi…
-
comment
Comment #49238470
Or rather, unsurprising response. Obviously everyone is going to cheer when what's his face gets killed. I mean how many 100,000s of people can your company murder before you get o…
-
comment
Comment #49228336
> In most rich countries, the % of income people pay already goes up with income. Right. But rich people don't have income, so they don't pay any taxes. Our tax code is not progres…
-
comment
Comment #49228300
Piketty's tax goes into effect only for wealth greater than a certain amount. The goal is to target people who are paying insufficient income tax, because they are so wealthy they …
-
comment
Comment #49228270
I mean that's the entire point of structuring your taxes so they are unavoidable. Piketty's proposal of a 2% wealth tax floor on wealth over $100M is a great way to solve that prob…
-
comment
Comment #49219058
Nobody knows what the Laffer curve is. Maybe we should be raising taxes. I'm not sure what point you're trying to make
-
comment
Comment #49219045
I don't know if you remember, but Elon recently spent over $200M getting his chosen guy elected. He then went on to waste over $100B tax dollars trying to "cut fraud", retiring in …
-
comment
Comment #49219037
Regulatory capture by business interests seems like something you'd solve via government, ironically.
-
comment
Comment #49219034
Nobody is suggesting that raising the effective tax rate for the richest people will magically fix all our problems. However, we are saying that making the tax code progressive is …
-
comment
Comment #49219030
Piketty's 2% tax floor on wealth (for those with over $10M/$100M in wealth) is an excellent way to fix this. Basically the idea is to just accept the fact that the super wealthy wi…
-
comment
Comment #49219021
Just look at growth rates before Reagan/Thatcher in the US/UK and after. If you take the 30 years before and the 30 years after, you'll see growth actually decreased. Obviously thi…
-
comment
Comment #49219008
I'm reading Piketty's book now and it's not isolated to the US. Once you hit a certain wealth in most OECD countries, you just stop paying taxes. All that is required is to not tak…
-
comment
Comment #49178892
Well if we did that we'd only save 40,000 lives and ~$1T in transit costs a year. Such savings and improvements in quality of life are unthinkable in the US! \s
-
comment
Comment #49105558
Are you including corporate spending and government spending, or just private spending? Because private spending for the 1% is largely irrelevant in this context.
-
comment
Comment #49105533
It seems unlikely there will be a billion Americans. Population growth is 0.3% and will likely decline further as native FTR declines.
-
comment
Comment #49079693
Who cares? Distillation is in the same class of theft as Anthropic stealing their data in the first place. By all means, Anthropic can try to prevent distillation. It'll be like ho…
-
comment
Comment #49079658
I suspect FOSS will converge/create a best-in-class harness within the next 6 months or so. As will most (all?) software, the FOSS stuff somehow always ends up being way better tha…
-
comment
Comment #49051404
Negligence is criminally prosecutable.
-
comment
Comment #49051394
It's worse than an honor system, because humans are constrained by social forces to some extent, whereas we don't know what AI is or how it will behave
-
comment
Comment #49050020
Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but the code I get from LLMs would not be considered acceptable to merge before we collectively stopped having standards. People are committing 900…
-
comment
Comment #49049954
Ridiculous. If investors wish to set their money on fire investing in over-valued companies, they are welcome to do so. Protectionism to preserve ROI is a dumb policy. Just look at…
-
comment
Comment #49049895
Hilariously bad take. Open weight models can be retrained of fine-tuned, that's the entire point. The idea that the "Chinese government controls your intelligence" is laughable in …
-
comment
Comment #49030620
Dealing drugs is highly profitable