Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — dann0

dann0

HN member
Joined
Sat, Jun 08, 2019, 11:00 PM UTC
HN karma
93
Public activity
86 items

About dann0

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #43592378

    This doesn't really work because the big firms that consumers boycott have political leverage and magically become too big to fail. It also presupposes that unregulated capitalism …

  2. comment
    Comment #43541367

    That's not right. The more a term is in the market, the more difficult it is to get a trademark approved. The difficulty comes from the obligation to protect a trademark - if you h…

  3. comment
    Comment #43488306

    There's a huge survivorship bias in the overall conversation about old things being better than new things. The poorly made houses from 100 years ago just aren't there anymore. The…

  4. comment
    Comment #41415220

    I saw God's Debris by Scott Adams and now seriously doubt the quality of this list. Not helped by seeing the review of Der Kreativitäts-Code as being "Here’s a book I plan on readi…

  5. comment
    Comment #41287851

    It's really not suddenly. They keep making the same mistakes. This is the second or third time the app has changed and they've got it wrong. I have to use two apps to control my So…

  6. comment
    Comment #41106951

    I sync it with my own synology.

  7. comment
    Comment #41098566

    The AMULET Project was an asynchronous version of ARM microprocessors. Maybe one could design away the clock like with these? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMULET_(processor)

  8. comment
    Comment #41051339

    I like Joplin. Has the features you've asked for

  9. comment
    Comment #40232759

    No, people go to where the resources and opportunities are. Markets are for maximising profits. Housing should not be a market.

  10. comment
    Comment #39641012

    I have sympathy for Apple. They are essentially being forced to do business with a known bad actor, and that bad actor has continually demonstrated a pattern of behaviour that is u…

  11. comment
    Comment #39622489

    First, it’s weird that anyone would take the side of Epic in any argument. Second, it’s obvious that no one had actually read the article. Epic admitted that they have deliberately…

  12. comment
    Comment #39599408

    That’s fair, but they weren’t out of the woods yet. But probably less important than I previously stated/thought.

  13. comment
    Comment #39577760

    I’d argue that the Motorola iTunes phone was a success. I don’t think its goal was to be a great phone, I think it was to bring in some much needed cash. The original Apple TV, lik…

  14. comment
    Comment #39577738

    It is actually very Apple, and perhaps even more so at post-Jobs Apple. The iPod wasn’t as good on paper as the Rio or Rune. Cost a LOT more too. The original iPhone wasn’t great, …

  15. comment
    Comment #39546595

    It’s new to me, but I’m not in the community. Sounds like it might solve many of the challenges I had esp. getting started.

  16. comment
    Comment #39140131

    I’d agree, but the developer in this example could still use the iOS App Store for free using the current terms

  17. comment
    Comment #39140117

    Only if you choose the new terms. The current ones are still available to you. I definitely don’t love all of the detail of either option. However, why would one chose an option th…

  18. comment
    Comment #39138537

    Oh, I’m not a blind supporter of Apple. They absolutely could be much less arrogant and handle this and many other things much better. However, the entitlement that is pervasive he…

  19. comment
    Comment #39138506

    No, reinstalls and updates don’t get counted. This is in the linked page: “each first annual install per year over a 1 million threshold”. This applies only to iOS Apps. iPad OS an…

  20. comment
    Comment #39138309

    Again, that’s a choice you’ve made. I’d argue that a number way less than 1 million installs would signify enough success to start charging for

  21. comment
    Comment #39138298

    Have a look into Westfield / Scentre. I think a large part of the disagreement here is the idea that all digital things should be free compared to how the physical world has been f…

  22. comment
    Comment #39137758

    Have they? You need to substantiate that claim. 1. Developers can continue to use the existing terms. 2. If a smaller developer elects to use the new terms, they pay less commissio…

  23. comment
    Comment #39137593

    This is, in fact, a bad faith argument. Developers are not forced to develop iOS apps. There are other alternatives like web apps or only developing for Android. Developers have ch…

  24. comment
    Comment #38887236

    Luckily, small developers are unlikely to reach the $1m pa to qualify for the 30% fee. They’ll be subject to 15%.

  25. comment
    Comment #38704219

    And Beeper would lose. This isn’t antitrust.