Viewing profile — dann0
dann0
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jun 08, 2019, 11:00 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 93
- Public activity
- 86 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About dann0
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #43592378
This doesn't really work because the big firms that consumers boycott have political leverage and magically become too big to fail. It also presupposes that unregulated capitalism …
-
comment
Comment #43541367
That's not right. The more a term is in the market, the more difficult it is to get a trademark approved. The difficulty comes from the obligation to protect a trademark - if you h…
-
comment
Comment #43488306
There's a huge survivorship bias in the overall conversation about old things being better than new things. The poorly made houses from 100 years ago just aren't there anymore. The…
-
comment
Comment #41415220
I saw God's Debris by Scott Adams and now seriously doubt the quality of this list. Not helped by seeing the review of Der Kreativitäts-Code as being "Here’s a book I plan on readi…
-
comment
Comment #41287851
It's really not suddenly. They keep making the same mistakes. This is the second or third time the app has changed and they've got it wrong. I have to use two apps to control my So…
-
comment
Comment #41106951
I sync it with my own synology.
-
comment
Comment #41098566
The AMULET Project was an asynchronous version of ARM microprocessors. Maybe one could design away the clock like with these? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMULET_(processor)
-
comment
Comment #41051339
I like Joplin. Has the features you've asked for
-
comment
Comment #40232759
No, people go to where the resources and opportunities are. Markets are for maximising profits. Housing should not be a market.
-
comment
Comment #39641012
I have sympathy for Apple. They are essentially being forced to do business with a known bad actor, and that bad actor has continually demonstrated a pattern of behaviour that is u…
-
comment
Comment #39622489
First, it’s weird that anyone would take the side of Epic in any argument. Second, it’s obvious that no one had actually read the article. Epic admitted that they have deliberately…
-
comment
Comment #39599408
That’s fair, but they weren’t out of the woods yet. But probably less important than I previously stated/thought.
-
comment
Comment #39577760
I’d argue that the Motorola iTunes phone was a success. I don’t think its goal was to be a great phone, I think it was to bring in some much needed cash. The original Apple TV, lik…
-
comment
Comment #39577738
It is actually very Apple, and perhaps even more so at post-Jobs Apple. The iPod wasn’t as good on paper as the Rio or Rune. Cost a LOT more too. The original iPhone wasn’t great, …
-
comment
Comment #39546595
It’s new to me, but I’m not in the community. Sounds like it might solve many of the challenges I had esp. getting started.
-
comment
Comment #39140131
I’d agree, but the developer in this example could still use the iOS App Store for free using the current terms
-
comment
Comment #39140117
Only if you choose the new terms. The current ones are still available to you. I definitely don’t love all of the detail of either option. However, why would one chose an option th…
-
comment
Comment #39138537
Oh, I’m not a blind supporter of Apple. They absolutely could be much less arrogant and handle this and many other things much better. However, the entitlement that is pervasive he…
-
comment
Comment #39138506
No, reinstalls and updates don’t get counted. This is in the linked page: “each first annual install per year over a 1 million threshold”. This applies only to iOS Apps. iPad OS an…
-
comment
Comment #39138309
Again, that’s a choice you’ve made. I’d argue that a number way less than 1 million installs would signify enough success to start charging for
-
comment
Comment #39138298
Have a look into Westfield / Scentre. I think a large part of the disagreement here is the idea that all digital things should be free compared to how the physical world has been f…
-
comment
Comment #39137758
Have they? You need to substantiate that claim. 1. Developers can continue to use the existing terms. 2. If a smaller developer elects to use the new terms, they pay less commissio…
-
comment
Comment #39137593
This is, in fact, a bad faith argument. Developers are not forced to develop iOS apps. There are other alternatives like web apps or only developing for Android. Developers have ch…
-
comment
Comment #38887236
Luckily, small developers are unlikely to reach the $1m pa to qualify for the 30% fee. They’ll be subject to 15%.
-
comment
Comment #38704219
And Beeper would lose. This isn’t antitrust.