Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — danmux

danmux

HN member
Joined
Sun, Sep 05, 2010, 12:49 PM UTC
HN karma
41
Public activity
41 items

About danmux

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/danmux; my proof: https://keybase.io/danmux/sigs/BKVzd0hgEATY70jc4aRweoVp-YTwF65viZ1t5uQj_ao ]

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #16535064

    Good points well made. I hope I'll be able to prioritise trying Nix at some point.

  2. comment
    Comment #16532114

    Not trampling, just holding at arms length. Recognising the reality of the economics of most projects. Unless you live in a completely deterministic world, devoid of human fallibil…

  3. comment
    Comment #16529939

    yes, could easily have been the latter

  4. comment
    Comment #16529718

    hmm, yes, this was always going to be a contentious point, and highly subjective. I think the main issue here is it was in a large part also a very human impact, which is much hard…

  5. comment
    Comment #16529666

    Regarding Gazelle, yes, the CI would break early if it detected a none porcelain repo after running Gazelle itself. I think others may have configured their editors, but for me the…

  6. comment
    Comment #16529608

    To give a tool a fair chance I think it has to be used daily to really grok the pleasure / pain. We were aware of some of the problems, but perhaps overly confident about managing …

  7. comment
  8. comment
    Comment #16528801

    Also as you work with Python, you may want to look at the link between Basil Fawlty and your chosen language :)

  9. comment
    Comment #16528767

    I probably should have made the context clearer earlier in the post - later on I mention : "To set the scene, our codebase is mainly Go, including vendor directories, and a conside…

  10. comment
    Comment #16528754

    Glad it can help show you some of the pitfalls, though I'm not sure how well our experience extrapolates to a primarily python codebase. I have added a link to the classic scene as…

  11. comment
    Comment #16528655

    hahah. oops.

  12. comment
    Comment #13061723

    Totally agree with distancing from Reddit. I would contribute to a federated non-repudiable system. Moderation can be just as auditable. (Perhaps with some emergency actions that t…

  13. story
  14. comment
    Comment #12365353

    And this : http://www.unofficialgoogledatascience.com/2015/12/replacing... replacing Sawzall with Golang :|

  15. comment
    Comment #12348486

    Fair point, just differing levels of hoops to jump through, or general expectations of best practice. In that sense I would say Java and C# do not allow you to 'ignore' exceptions.…

  16. comment
    Comment #12342909

    I would tend to agree, based on instinct, that Go is poor for data science work (as it happens I am about to find out for real in the coming weeks :| ). To build systems to feed da…

  17. comment
    Comment #12342895

    The irony in all of these comments is that they almost all fall back to, or start with, discussing language design, and on the whole ignore the tools and processes that have a cons…

  18. comment
    Comment #12342823

    Thank you, and may I say what a well written comment. Poor old Tony Hoare (algol was mentioned earlier (rightly) as an exemplar of innovation) but Null in a safe memory managed con…

  19. comment
    Comment #12342742

    I'm no language historian, but I did limit my timeframe to my personal experience of 36 years of development for a reason. There was necessarily incredible research in the 20 years…

  20. comment
    Comment #12342636

    Yes I think golang hits a sweet spot here, and I do truly think it is the 'other things' that win in whole lifecycle practice.

  21. story
  22. comment
    Comment #8002449

    wow locust.io - looks great, thanks, I'm surprised I missed that. I'm becoming more and more of a fan of code over configuration. I'll definitely give that a go

  23. comment
    Comment #7995897

    possibly using http://tip.golang.org/pkg/net/http/httptest and a bit of workflow management - would not be too hard

  24. story
  25. comment
    Comment #4424324

    Wow, my bad! Thanks for pointing that out. If you scale my numbers up that would be costing you $60,000 per month. If you are doing recommendations you are probably processing sign…