Viewing profile — danielmewes
danielmewes
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jun 06, 2011, 7:07 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 94
- Public activity
- 59 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About danielmewes
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #47185274
Author here. We originally developed our evolution-inspired tool to optimize LLM prompts. To our surprise, we found that the same method also worked well for getting better perform…
- story
-
comment
Comment #46220527
Using an LLM to hallucinate arbitrary apps, one screen and user interaction at a time.
- story
-
comment
Comment #45432932
It's on our roadmap! Any particular features you'd be looking for when we add support for those models/agents?
- comment
-
comment
Comment #11719126
Edit: While Horizon assigns versions internally, it looks like they are not currently used for catching concurrent client-side modifications by different users. (I previously wrote…
-
comment
Comment #11442260
You'll need to pass the a certificate to `connect` through the `ssl` option, see http://www.rethinkdb.com/api/python/connect/
-
comment
Comment #11362365
Daniel @ RethinkDB here. We're constantly improving performance and a lot has happened within the past year. I think that at this point RethinkDB is as good a database for analytic…
-
comment
Comment #11299839
Daniel from RethinkDB here. The answer is yes, that's definitely on the radar. I can't give an ETA for the official drivers yet, but I hope it's going to happen relatively soon.
-
comment
Comment #11083487
We've heard from a lot of users who want to run RethinkDB on their Windows computer for development purposes. Production servers could then run on either Linux or Windows. I'm not …
-
comment
Comment #11083446
> That's not what http://rethinkdb.com/docs/quickstart/ says. It shows a connection that exposes context-bound Builder methods with trigger (insert, changes, run, etc) methods. I t…
-
comment
Comment #11075265
You might want to check out the new Windows build instructions here: https://github.com/rethinkdb/rethinkdb/blob/atnnn/windows2/W... We've since simplified the build process, and i…
-
comment
Comment #11070414
A new epoch timestamp is generated when you either first create a new table, or when you use the "emergency repair" operation to manually recover from a dead Raft cluster (usually …
-
comment
Comment #10706457
Daniel @ RethinkDB here. We're going to add an asynchronous API soon. We decided to get the synchronous driver out to get some early feedback and because we know that a lot of our …
-
comment
Comment #10706411
Yes! We wanted to get the synchronous driver out first to get feedback. But a non-blocking mode is definitely coming up. https://github.com/rethinkdb/rethinkdb/issues/4802
-
comment
Comment #10044755
We only submitted the configuration that passed all scenarios, but tested some of the others internally. You generally don't get guaranteed linearizability of operations under netw…
-
comment
Comment #10043899
We're still working on the full documentation for the Twisted and asyncio backends. We'll put it up in the next days. You can find the Tornado documentation under the link coffeemu…
-
comment
Comment #10043213
Unfortunately 2.0 nodes cannot connect to 2.1 nodes and vice versa, so depending on your table configuration you might need to update all of them at the same time.
-
comment
Comment #9919537
If I understand that scenario correctly, it assumes that there is a node that can successfully send messages to the other nodes in the cluster, but cannot receive any responses. Si…
-
comment
Comment #9917905
Ah, I have to check how we behave in that case. Thanks for the pointers.
-
comment
Comment #9906396
We haven't added special logic for handling such cases. I think having servers with particularly unstable connectivity in a RethinkDB cluster is really uncommon though. If you want…